Disclaimer
This edited version has been archived due to the length of time since original publication. It should not be regarded as indicative of the ATO's current views. The law may have changed since original publication, and views in the edited version may also be affected by subsequent precedents and new approaches to the application of the law.

You cannot rely on this record in your tax affairs. It is not binding and provides you with no protection (including from any underpaid tax, penalty or interest). In addition, this record is not an authority for the purposes of establishing a reasonably arguable position for you to apply to your own circumstances. For more information on the status of edited versions of private advice and reasons we publish them, see PS LA 2008/4.

Edited version of your written advice

Authorisation Number: 1012708318194

Ruling

Subject: Rental property expenses

Question

Are you entitled to a deduction for X% of the rental property expenses?

Answer

No.

This ruling applies for the following period

Year ending 30 June 2015

Year ending 30 June 2016

Year ending 30 June 2017

The scheme commences on

1 July 2014

Relevant facts and circumstances

You and your partner intend to purchase a property which will be used to earn rental income.

The mortgage for the property will be held jointly between you and your partner.

The mortgage repayments will be made from a joint bank account owned and contributed to by you and your partner.

You will pay X% of all expenses related to the rental property.

You partner will have legal title of the property as sole owner.

Your name will be omitted from the title for administrative ease.

Relevant legislative provisions

Income Tax Assessment Act 1997 section 8-1

Reasons for decision

Section 8-1 of the Income Tax Assessment Act 1997 (ITAA 1997) allows a deduction for all losses and outgoings to the extent to which they are incurred in gaining or producing income except where the outgoings are of a capital, private or domestic nature.

Taxation Ruling TR 93/32 deals with the division of net income or loss between rental property co-owners. A rental property owner is required to return income and expenses in relation to their rental property in the same proportion as their ownership interest.

Generally, the profit or loss should be shared according to the legal interests of the owners. If the equitable interest does not follow the legal title, there is some basis for the profit or loss to be distributed on the equitable and not the legal basis. However, paragraph 41 of TR 93/32 states the following:

    We consider that there are extremely limited circumstances where the legal and equitable interests are not the same and that there is sufficient evidence to establish that the equitable interest is different from the legal title. We will assume where taxpayers are related, e.g., husband and wife, that the equitable right is exactly the same as the legal title.

In this case, you and your partner intend to purchase a rental property. However, the legal title will be solely in the name of your partner. You have advised that you will be omitted from the title for administrative ease. Given the nature of your relationship we consider that the equitable ownership of the property is exactly the same as the legal title. As legal title to the property will be held solely by your spouse, you will not have a legal or equitable interest in the property.

Therefore, you are not entitled to a deduction for X% of the rental property expenses.