| Disclaimer This edited version has been archived due to the length of time since original publication. It should not be regarded as indicative of the ATO's current views. The law may have changed since original publication, and views in the edited version may also be affected by subsequent precedents and new approaches to the application of the law. You cannot rely on this record in your tax affairs. It is not binding and provides you with no protection (including from any underpaid tax, penalty or interest). In addition, this record is not an authority for the purposes of establishing a reasonably arguable position for you to apply to your own circumstances. For more information on the status of edited versions of private advice and reasons we publish them, see PS LA 2008/4. |
Edited version of your written advice
Authorisation Number: 1012724740416
Ruling
Subject: Non-commercial losses and the Commissioner's discretion
Question
Will the Commissioner exercise the discretion in paragraph 35-55(1)(b) of the Income Tax Assessment Act 1997 (ITAA 1997) to allow you to include any losses from your massage activity in the calculation of your taxable income for the 2013-14 to 2015-16 financial years?
Answer
No.
This ruling applies for the following period
Year ended 30 June 2014
Year ended 30 June 2015
Year ended 30 June 2016
The scheme commenced on
25 March 2014
Relevant facts
You are an independent representative in a network marketing field.
You did not generate any income from the activity during the relevant financial year.
You satisfy subsection 35-10(2E) of the ITAA 1997 as your adjusted taxable income was less than $250,000.
You do not satisfy any of the four tests set out in Division 35 of the ITAA 1997.
You expect to satisfy the assessable income test and make a profit in the 2015-16 financial year.
Relevant legislative provisions
Income Tax Assessment Act 1997 - Section 35-1.
Income Tax Assessment Act 1997 - Subsection 35-10(2E).
Income Tax Assessment Act 1997 - Subsection 35-55(1)
Income Tax Assessment Act 1997 - Paragraph 35-55(1)(b.
Reasons for decision
For the 2009-10 and later income years, Division 35 of the ITAA 1997 will apply to defer a non-commercial loss from a business activity unless:
• you satisfy the income requirement and you pass one of the four tests
• the exceptions apply
• the Commissioner exercises his discretion.
The relevant discretion may be exercised for the income year in question where:
• it is in the nature of the business activity that there will be a period of time before it can be expected to pass one of the four tests
• there is an objective expectation your business activity will produce a tax profit or meet one of the four tests within a commercially viable period for your industry.
The note to paragraph 35-55(1)(b) states that it is:
…intended to cover a business activity that has a lead time between the commencement of the activity and the production of any assessable income. For example, an activity involving the planting of hardwood trees for harvest, where many years would pass before the activity could reasonably be expected to produce income.
The type of feature contemplated by the phrase 'because of its nature', in the context in which it appears, is that referred to in the note quoted above. That is, that there is an inherent or innate feature of the activity resulting in an inability to produce income in the year of commencement and (in most cases) a number of years thereafter. This is borne out further by paragraph 1.51 of the Explanatory Memorandum for the New Business Tax System (Integrity Measures) Act 2000, which states:
This arm [paragraph 35-55(1)(b)] of the safeguard discretion will ensure that the loss deferral rule in section 35-10 does not adversely impact on taxpayers who have commenced to carry on activities which by their nature require a number of years to produce assessable income. Examples of activities which would fall into this category are forestry, viticulture and certain horticultural activities.
The note and the passage cited above do not support any view that the discretion should be exercised for any start-up activity that is yet, for example, to satisfy the assessable income test in section 35-30 of the ITAA 1997, simply because of the small scale on which it was started, or because a client base is being built up. Those sorts of constraints on being able to satisfy that test are far removed from the specific one referred to in the note and the Explanatory Memorandum.
You satisfied the income requirement, however you were unable to satisfy any of the four tests under Division 35 of the ITAA 1997. You commenced your business in 20XX and you are building up a client base. These sorts of constraints are normal for all businesses which are starting out and there is nothing inherent in the nature of the business which would warrant the Commissioner to exercise his discretion under paragraph 35-55(1)(b) of the ITAA 1997.