Edited version of your written advice

Authorisation Number: 1012767390476

Ruling

Subject: Small business concessions

Question 1

Will the Commissioner, pursuant to subsection 104-190(2) of the Income Tax Assessment Act 1997 (ITAA 1997), extend the time limit for the replacement asset to be acquired?

Answer

Yes.

This ruling applies for the following period:

Year ending 30 June 2015

The scheme commences on:

1 July 2012

Relevant facts and circumstances

This ruling is based on the facts stated in the description of the scheme that is set out below. If your circumstances are materially different from these facts, this ruling has no effect and you cannot rely on it. The fact sheet has more information about relying on your private ruling.

You disposed of a business and therefore had a CGT event during the 20XX financial year.

You elected to defer the capital gain under the small business roll-over concession.

You have been looking to set up a new business. The set-up of this business has been delayed.

You are located in regional Australia and have found it difficult to find a suitable location.

You have now found a suitable location and estimate that it will be ready to trade by the end of the relevant financial year.

The estimated set up costs in relation to the new business will be in excess of the capital gain that was rolled over.

Relevant legislative provisions

Income Tax Assessment Act 1997 subsection 104-185(1).

Income Tax Assessment Act 1997 subsection 104-190(2).

Income Tax Assessment Act 1997 Subdivision 152-A.

Reasons for decision

The small business roll-over allows you to defer the capital gain made from a capital gains tax (CGT) event if you acquire one or more replacement assets and satisfy certain conditions. The conditions which must be met to obtain relief are set out in Subdivision 152-A of the ITAA 1997.

For you to obtain a roll-over, subsection 104-185(1) of the ITAA 1997 requires you to acquire a replacement asset, and that it be an active asset of yours, within a period starting one year before, and ending two years after the date of disposal of the original asset. Subsection 104-190(2) of the ITAA 1997 states that the Commissioner may exercise his discretion to extend those time limits.

You disposed of your business during the 20XX financial year. The two year limit in which to find a replacement consequently expired during the 20YY financial year.

During this period, you have made numerous efforts to secure a suitable location to start a new business. Due to being located in regional Australia, you have found it difficult to find a suitable location. However, you have found a location and believe that your new business will be trading by the end of the 20YY financial year.

In determining if the discretion would be exercised the Commissioner has considered the following factors:

• evidence of an acceptable explanation for the period of the extension requested (and whether it would be fair and equitable in the circumstances to provide such an extension)

• prejudice to the Commissioner which may result from the additional time being allowed (but the mere absence of prejudice is not enough to justify the granting of an extension)

• unsettling of people, other than the Commissioner, or of established practices

• fairness to people in like positions and the wider public interest

• whether any mischief is involved, and

• consequences of the decision.

Having considered the relevant facts, the Commissioner is able to apply his discretion under subsection 104-190(2) of the ITAA 1997 and allow an extension of time until 30 June 20YY.