Disclaimer This edited version has been archived due to the length of time since original publication. It should not be regarded as indicative of the ATO's current views. The law may have changed since original publication, and views in the edited version may also be affected by subsequent precedents and new approaches to the application of the law. You cannot rely on this record in your tax affairs. It is not binding and provides you with no protection (including from any underpaid tax, penalty or interest). In addition, this record is not an authority for the purposes of establishing a reasonably arguable position for you to apply to your own circumstances. For more information on the status of edited versions of private advice and reasons we publish them, see PS LA 2008/4. |
Edited version of your written advice
Authorisation Number: 1012786255505
Ruling
Subject: Proposed internal reorganisation
Part A
Question A1
Will the disposal of the SubCo shares by the Australian Company income tax consolidated group satisfy the preconditions in subsection 768-505(1) of the ITAA 1997?
Answer
Yes
Question A3
Is the exploration for minerals considered to be a 'business' within the meaning of subparagraph 768-540(1)(b)(i) of the ITAA 1997?
Answer
Yes
Question A4
Will the active foreign business asset percentage of SubCo as determined under the method statement in subsection 768-520(1) of the ITAA 1997 be 100%?
Answer
Yes
Part B
Question B1
Will any part of the distribution made by Australian Company to the Foreign Company be treated as a dividend within the meaning of section 6(1) of the ITAA 1936?
Answer
No
Question B2
Will the Commissioner seek to make a determination under section 45B of the ITAA 1936 that section 45C of the ITAA 1936 applies?
Answer
No
Part C
Question C1
Will the Commissioner seek to apply Part IVA of the ITAA 1936 in relation to the scheme?
Answer
No
Relevant facts and circumstances
Australia Company is a wholly owned subsidiary company of Foreign Company and is a tax resident of Australia.
Australia Company acquired all of the shares in Holding Co.
Holding Co is an Australian resident company.
Proposed internal reorganisation
The proposed internal reorganisation and subsequent distribution would consist of the following steps:
Step 1
• Australia Company will elect to form an income tax consolidated group
Step 2
Holding Co (as a subsidiary member of the Australia Company Group) will dispose of all of its interests in the SubCo to Foreign Company at market value.
Step 3
Holding Co will make a distribution to Australia Company.
On the basis that Holding Co and Australia Company are both members of the same income tax consolidated group, this step should have no Australian income tax consequences.
Step 4
Australia Company will make a distribution to its shareholder, Foreign Company:
• The proposed distribution is to be accounted for by Australia Company as a debit against the amount standing to the credit of its share capital account and a credit to the promissory note owed by Foreign Company.
• The total amount of the distribution is proposed to be debited against the share capital account.
• Since its incorporation, Australia Company has not made any distributions.
• The share capital account of Australia Company is not a tainted share capital account.
Relevant legislative provisions
Income Tax Assessment Act 1997 subsection 768-505(1)
Income Tax Assessment Act 1997 subsection 768-520(1)
Income Tax Assessment Act 1997 subparagraph 768-540(1)(b)(i)
Income Tax Assessment Act 1936 subsection 6(1)
Income Tax Assessment Act 1936 subsection 44(1)
Income Tax Assessment Act 1936 Part IVA
Reasons for decision
Part A
Question A1 to A7
The Applicant satisfied all of the requisite requirements of the relevant legislative provisions for the purposes of answering questions A1 to A7 of the ruling application.
Part B
Question B1
The requirements of a 'distribution' under subsection 6(1) of the ITAA 1936 were not satisfied.
Question B2
The Applicant failed to meet all of the relevant requirements of section 45B of the ITAA 1936.
Part C
Question C1
The proposed scheme did not meet all of the requirements of Part IVA of the ITAA 1936.