Disclaimer
This edited version has been archived due to the length of time since original publication. It should not be regarded as indicative of the ATO's current views. The law may have changed since original publication, and views in the edited version may also be affected by subsequent precedents and new approaches to the application of the law.

You cannot rely on this record in your tax affairs. It is not binding and provides you with no protection (including from any underpaid tax, penalty or interest). In addition, this record is not an authority for the purposes of establishing a reasonably arguable position for you to apply to your own circumstances. For more information on the status of edited versions of private advice and reasons we publish them, see PS LA 2008/4.

Edited version of your written advice

Authorisation Number: 1012880688224

Date of advice: 18 September 2015

Ruling

Subject: Replacement asset

Question

Will the Commissioner use his discretion to extend the replacement asset period pursuant to subsection 104-190(2) of the Income Tax Assessment Act 1997 (ITAA 1997) in respect of the Small Business capital gains tax (CGT) replacement asset roll-over relief to 30 June 2016?

Answer

Yes.

This ruling applies for the following periods:

Year ended 30 June 2013

Year ended 30 June 2014

Year ended 30 June 2015

Year ended 30 June 2016

The scheme commences on:

1 July 2012

Relevant facts and circumstances

You disposed of a business and therefore had a CGT event during the relevant financial year.

You elected to defer the capital gain under the small business roll-over concession.

Within a year of disposing of the business you exchanged contracts to lease a property to commence another business.

However, the development application you submitted to the local council was required by the council to be revised and then your revised application was rejected.

You then applied for the decision to be reviewed which you later withdrew in accordance with legal advice.

The whole process to try to establish a replacement business at the first site you chose took some time.

You have found a second site and are undertaking the development application process.

Relevant legislative provisions

Income Tax Assessment Act 1997 subsection 104-190(2)

Income Tax Assessment Act 1997 subdivision 152-A

Reasons for decision

The small business roll-over allows you to defer the capital gain made from a CGT event if you acquire one or more replacement assets and satisfy certain conditions. The conditions which must be met to obtain relief are set out in Subdivision 152-A of the ITAA 1997.

You can choose the roll-over even if you have not yet acquired a replacement asset. However CGT event J5 happens if, by the end of the replacement asset period, you do not acquire a suitable replacement asset which is an active asset. CGT event J6 happens if, by the end of the replacement asset period, the cost base (first, second and fourth elements only) of the replacement asset(s) you acquired is less than the capital gains disregarded under the roll-over provisions.

The replacement asset period starts one year before, and ends 2 years after, the last CGT event in the income year for which you obtain the roll-over. Subsection 104-190(2) provides that the Commissioner may extend the replacement asset period.

During this period you have actively pursued the set-up of replacement businesses. Site 1, which was expected to be operating within the replacement asset period, was rejected by the council. You have found a second site and are undertaking the development application process.

For these reasons, to date you have been unable to acquire suitable replacement asset(s).

In determining if the discretion would be exercised the Commissioner has considered the following factors:

    • evidence of an acceptable explanation for the period of the extension requested (and whether it would be fair and equitable in the circumstances to provide such an extension)

    • prejudice to the Commissioner which may result from the additional time being allowed (but the mere absence of prejudice is not enough to justify the granting of an extension)

    • unsettling of people, other than the Commissioner, or of established practices

    • fairness to people in like positions and the wider public interest

    • whether any mischief is involved, and

    • consequences of the decision.

Having considered the relevant facts, the Commissioner is able to apply his discretion under subsection 104-190(2) and allow an extension of time.