Disclaimer
This edited version has been archived due to the length of time since original publication. It should not be regarded as indicative of the ATO's current views. The law may have changed since original publication, and views in the edited version may also be affected by subsequent precedents and new approaches to the application of the law.

You cannot rely on this record in your tax affairs. It is not binding and provides you with no protection (including from any underpaid tax, penalty or interest). In addition, this record is not an authority for the purposes of establishing a reasonably arguable position for you to apply to your own circumstances. For more information on the status of edited versions of private advice and reasons we publish them, see PS LA 2008/4.

Edited version of your written advice

Authorisation Number: 1012927496531

Date of advice: 15 December 2015

Ruling

Subject: Genuine redundancy

Question

Did the Taxpayer's years of service need to be continuous when applying the threshold in accordance with section 83-170 of the Income Tax Assessment Act 1997?

Answer

No

This ruling applies for the following period

Income year ended 30 June 2016

The scheme commenced on

1 July 2015

Relevant facts and circumstances

1. The Taxpayer was employed by the Employer for a period of time as an Employee and Contractor.

2. The Taxpayer provided her executed Deed of Separation (the Deed).

3. The Taxpayer was made redundant on the Effective date.

4. The Deed accepts that the Taxpayer was employed for a certain number of years as an Employee and Contractor.

5. The Taxpayer's entitlements included a redundancy payout by the Employer.

6. The Taxpayer stated that the Employer incorrectly used the period of years of service in calculating the tax free portion of the genuine redundancy payment.

Relevant legislative provisions

Income Tax Assessment Act 1997 section 83-170

Reasons for decision

Summary

7. The Taxpayer's period of service should include the Taxpayer's period of employment (not including the contracting period).

Tax-free amount of a genuine redundancy payment

8. Tax-free treatment of genuine redundancy payments and early retirement scheme payments

9. Section 83-170 of the Income Tax Assessment Act 1997 (ITAA 1997) applies

    a) if you receive a * genuine redundancy payment or an * early retirement scheme payment.

    b) So much of the relevant payment as does not exceed the amount worked out under subsection (3) is not assessable income and is not * exempt income.

    c) Work out the amount using the formula:

        Base amount + (Service amount x Years of service)

10. Some or all of a genuine redundancy payment may be non-assessable non-exempt income, and accordingly tax-free, under section 83-170 of the ITAA 1997.

11. The extent to which the payment is tax-free will depend on the amount of the payment and the total number of whole years of employment to which the payment relates. There is no requirement for the years of service to be continuous when applying the threshold in section 83-170 of the ITAA 1997.

12. Taxation Ruling TR 2009/12 at paragraph 70 states that:

    "If earlier years of service with a previous employer are carried over and acknowledged on commencement with a new employer that later makes a redundancy payment to an employee, those years of service can be included in working out the tax-free amount of the genuine redundancy payment".

13. TR 2009/12 at paragraph 46 states that:

    "the years of service provided by the dismissed employee and the value of their remuneration package at the time of the dismissal are the most influential factors in determining what could reasonably be expected under an arm's length dealing".

14. In view of the facts provided the Employer has recognised in the Deed the previous employment service. Therefore, the period of service in calculating the years of service should include the whole employment period, but not the period of contracted employment.

15. In addition, it would appear that the Employer paying an amount as a redundancy payout, and it would follow that would be calculated on a period of service longer than that originally recognised the Employer.