| Disclaimer This edited version has been archived due to the length of time since original publication. It should not be regarded as indicative of the ATO's current views. The law may have changed since original publication, and views in the edited version may also be affected by subsequent precedents and new approaches to the application of the law. You cannot rely on this record in your tax affairs. It is not binding and provides you with no protection (including from any underpaid tax, penalty or interest). In addition, this record is not an authority for the purposes of establishing a reasonably arguable position for you to apply to your own circumstances. For more information on the status of edited versions of private advice and reasons we publish them, see PS LA 2008/4. |
Edited version of your written advice
Authorisation Number: 1012927797202
Date of advice: 15 December 2015
Ruling
Subject: Back payment of salary
Question
Do you include back payment of wages in your taxable income for the period ending 30 June 2015 even though you received the payment in July 2015?
Answer
No.
This ruling applies for the following periods:
Year ended 30 June 2015
Year ending 30 June 2016
The scheme commenced on:
1 July 2014
Relevant facts and circumstances
You have received back payment of salary.
This back payment was for a period in the previous financial year.
You received this back payment in the current financial year.
Relevant legislative provisions
Income Tax Assessment Act 1997 Section 6-5
Income Tax Assessment Act 1997 Subsection 6-5(2)
Income Tax Assessment Act 1936 Section 159ZRA
Income Tax Assessment Act 1936 Subsection 159ZRA(1)
Reasons for decision
Section 6-5 of Income Tax Assessment Act 1997 (ITAA 1997) states your assessable income includes ordinary income derived directly or indirectly from all sources during the income year.
A lump sum payment is generally classified as ordinary income if it is simply a lump sum made up of periodic income payments but paid in arrears to cover a certain period. The payment substitutes income and has been held by the courts to be income under ordinary concepts (Federal Commissioner of Taxation v. Inkster (1989) 24 FCR 53; 89 ATC 5142, (1989) 20 ATR 1516). The payment retains the characteristics of ordinary income even though paid as a lump sum.
Taxation Ruling TR 98/1 states where the compensation amount is considered to be income under ordinary concepts; it is assessable in the income year it is received for the purposes of section 6-5 of the ITAA 1997, even though the payment may relate to a past or future income period.
In your case, the lump sum payment was for back payment of salary. It is considered to be ordinary income as it acquires the character of the income for which it substituted. This lump sum was received in the following financial year. Accordingly, the amount you received is ordinary income that is fully assessable in the income year it was received, being the current financial year.
Lump sum in arrears tax offset.
Individual taxpayers, who receive certain assessable lump sum payments containing an amount that accrued in earlier income years, may be entitled to a lump sum in arrears tax offset under section 159ZRA of the Income Tax Assessment Act 1936 (ITAA 1936). The tax offset is intended to overcome the problem of the lump sum attracting more tax in the year of receipt than would have been payable if the payment had been taxed in each of the years in which it accrued.
To be eligible income, the salary and wages must have accrued during a period ending more than 12 months before the date in which they are paid.
In your case, the back payment of salary was received less than 12 months after the period during which it accrued. You are therefore not entitled to a lump sum in arrears tax offset.