| Disclaimer This edited version has been archived due to the length of time since original publication. It should not be regarded as indicative of the ATO's current views. The law may have changed since original publication, and views in the edited version may also be affected by subsequent precedents and new approaches to the application of the law. You cannot rely on this record in your tax affairs. It is not binding and provides you with no protection (including from any underpaid tax, penalty or interest). In addition, this record is not an authority for the purposes of establishing a reasonably arguable position for you to apply to your own circumstances. For more information on the status of edited versions of private advice and reasons we publish them, see PS LA 2008/4. |
Edited version of your written advice
Authorisation Number: 1012980473723
Date of advice: 4 March 2016
Ruling
Subject: Capital gains tax - small business concessions - active asset
Question 1
Does the property you sold qualify as an active asset for the purposes of the small business capital gains tax concessions?
Answer
No.
This ruling applies for the following period:
Year ending 30 June 2014
The scheme commences on:
1 July 2013
Relevant facts and circumstances
You and your spouse purchased a commercial property in the 19XX calendar year.
The property was leased out as a retail outlet until it was sold in the relevant financial year.
You have owned the property for a number of years.
Relevant legislative provisions
Income Tax Assessment Act 1997 subsection 152-40(4).
Reasons for decision
This property does not qualify as an active asset, under subsection 152-40(4) of the ITAA 1997, as its main use was to derive rent.
Furthermore in the case of Jakjoy Pty Ltd v Federal Commissioner of Taxation [2013] AATA 526; 2013 ATC 10-328; (2013) 96 ATR 185 the taxpayer owned multiple commercial investment properties and argued it was carrying on a leasing business and the properties should therefore be treated as active assets for the purposes of the small business CGT concessions. The case went before the Administrative Appeals Tribunal (AAT), and it was determined that the properties were not active assets.
Even though the taxpayer was carrying on a property leasing business, the fact that the properties were rented out, to derive passive rental income meant that they were not capable of being active assets.