| Disclaimer This edited version has been archived due to the length of time since original publication. It should not be regarded as indicative of the ATO's current views. The law may have changed since original publication, and views in the edited version may also be affected by subsequent precedents and new approaches to the application of the law. You cannot rely on this record in your tax affairs. It is not binding and provides you with no protection (including from any underpaid tax, penalty or interest). In addition, this record is not an authority for the purposes of establishing a reasonably arguable position for you to apply to your own circumstances. For more information on the status of edited versions of private advice and reasons we publish them, see PS LA 2008/4. |
Edited version of your written advice
Authorisation Number: 1012990276969
Date of advice: 26 April 2016
Ruling
Subject: Grants, assessability and derivation
Question 1
Is an amount paid in accordance with the Commonwealth's obligations to Company E under the Research Program A Agreement (Research Program A) assessable as ordinary income of Company E under section 6-5 of the Income Tax Assessment Act 1997 (ITAA 1997) in the income year ending 31 December 20XX?
Answer 1
No.
Question 2
Are the milestone payments paid in accordance with the Research Program B Agreement (Program B Agreement), assessable as ordinary income of Company E under section 6-5 of the ITAA 1997 in the income year ending 31 December 20XX?
Answer 2
Yes.
Question 3
Are the Progress Report payments paid in accordance with the terms of the Research Program C Agreement (Program C Agreement), assessable as ordinary income of Company E under section 6-5 of the ITAA 1997 in the income year ending 31 December 20XX?
Answer 3
No.
This ruling applies for the following period
1 January 2014 to 31 December 2014
Reasons for decision
The ruling considered whether or not amounts paid by the Commonwealth to Company E in accordance with three specific research program agreements were assessable as ordinary income of Company E under section 6-5 of the ITAA 1997. Further, given the structure of the individual research program agreements, in particular the various contractual conditions embodied in each individual research program agreement, the ruling considered whether the funding provided thereunder was conditional in nature, and to what extent it should be recognised in the income year ending 31 December 20XX.
The Commissioner of Taxation ruled that the various payments received by Company E under all three research program agreements were assessable as ordinary income of Company E.
The Commissioner of Taxation also ruled that the payments received from the Commonwealth by Company E were contingent upon Company E satisfying the various contractual conditions within each particular research program agreement and as such were conditional in nature.
Due to the individual nature of each particular research program agreement, the Commissioner of Taxation ruled that some payments received by Company E were assessable in income years prior to 31 December 20XX, some in the income year ending 31 December 20XX and some after that income year.