| Disclaimer This edited version has been archived due to the length of time since original publication. It should not be regarded as indicative of the ATO's current views. The law may have changed since original publication, and views in the edited version may also be affected by subsequent precedents and new approaches to the application of the law. You cannot rely on this record in your tax affairs. It is not binding and provides you with no protection (including from any underpaid tax, penalty or interest). In addition, this record is not an authority for the purposes of establishing a reasonably arguable position for you to apply to your own circumstances. For more information on the status of edited versions of private advice and reasons we publish them, see PS LA 2008/4. |
Edited version of your written advice
Authorisation Number: 1013025096627
Date of advice: 26 May 2016
Ruling
Subject: Replacement of parts of depreciating assets
Question 1
Is the Company (as head entity of a tax consolidated group) entitled to a deduction, under either section 25-10 or section 8-1 of the Income Tax Assessment Act 1997, for the costs incurred in undertaking the Works?
Answer
No. The Works are not considered to be a repair to depreciating assets for the purposes of section 25-10, and in any event, the Works are considered to be of a capital nature and excluded from deductibility when incurred under section 25-10 and section 8-1.
We note however that capital costs associated with modifying a depreciating asset, that is used for deriving assessable income, may (subject to satisfying all the relevant requirements) qualify for a tax deduction over time under the capital allowance provisions of the ITAA 1997 (Division 40). The applicant had not required a ruling on those provisions.
Question 2
Is the Company (as head entity of a tax consolidated group) assessable, under either section 6-5 or section 15-10 of the Income Tax Assessment Act 1997, on the Fee received from the State for the Works?
Answer
Yes. The Fee is considered to be ordinary income received in the course of carrying on business that is assessable under section 6-5. In the alternative, the Fee is considered to be a subsidy received in relation to carrying on a business that is assessable under section 15-10 if section 6-5 does not apply.
This ruling applies for the following periods:
Years 2014, 2015, and 2016
The scheme commences on:
2014
Relevant facts and circumstances
The ruling was based on, and the Commissioner relied on, statements made by the applicant.
Under agreement with the State, the Australian resident Company was required to replace parts of its depreciating assets ('Works') which are used in carrying on its existing business for the purpose of gaining or producing assessable income. In consideration for undertaking the Works, the State pays the Company a sum not exceeding the costs incurred.
Relevant legislative provisions
Income Tax Assessment Act 1997 section 6-5
Income Tax Assessment Act 1997 section 15-10
Income Tax Assessment Act 1997 section 8-1
Income Tax Assessment Act 1997 section 25-10