Disclaimer
This edited version has been archived due to the length of time since original publication. It should not be regarded as indicative of the ATO's current views. The law may have changed since original publication, and views in the edited version may also be affected by subsequent precedents and new approaches to the application of the law.

You cannot rely on this record in your tax affairs. It is not binding and provides you with no protection (including from any underpaid tax, penalty or interest). In addition, this record is not an authority for the purposes of establishing a reasonably arguable position for you to apply to your own circumstances. For more information on the status of edited versions of private advice and reasons we publish them, see PS LA 2008/4.

Edited version of your written advice

Authorisation Number: 1013026014190

Date of advice: 31 May 2016

Ruling

Subject: Extension of time to apply the small business concessions

Question

Will the Commissioner exercise his discretion under subsection 152-80(3) of the Income Tax Assessment Act 1997 and allow extra time for you to apply the small business capital gains tax (CGT) concessions?

Answer

Yes.

This ruling applies for the following periods:

Year ending 30 June 2016

Year ending 30 June 2017

The scheme commences on:

1 July 2015

Relevant facts and circumstances

The deceased passed away during the relevant financial year.

The deceased was running a primary production property at their date of death.

Probate was granted during the subsequent financial year.

The estate had an amount of debt that had to be repaid. Some land and other assets were sold to cover the debt.

The executors distributed the remaining estate assets to the beneficiaries.

You inherited the title of a property that the deceased had inherited prior to 19 September 1985.

You were granted the title at the end of 20XX.

Work was required to be done to the property so that it could be sold.

The property is now on the market for sale.

The deceased would have been entitled to apply the 15 year exemption if they had sold the property just prior to their death.

Relevant legislative provisions

Income Tax Assessment Act 1997 Section 152-80.

Income Tax Assessment Act 1997 Subsection 152-80(3).

Reasons for decision

When a taxpayer acquires a CGT asset, including acquisition by inheritance, they are potentially liable for tax on any capital gain on that asset when a CGT event subsequently happens to it.

In some instances, a taxpayer can reduce the capital gain made from a CGT event by applying the small business CGT concessions. Section 152-80 of the ITAA 1997 allows either the legal personal representative of an estate or the beneficiary to apply the small business CGT concessions in respect of the sale of the deceased's asset in certain circumstances.

Specifically, the following conditions must be met:

    • the asset devolves to the legal personal representative or passes to a beneficiary, and

    • the deceased would have been able to apply the small business concessions themselves immediately prior to their death, and

    • a CGT event happens within two years of the deceased's death unless the Commissioner extends the time period in accordance with subsection 152-80(3) of the ITAA 1997.

In this case the deceased would have been able to apply the small business concessions to the property had they disposed of it immediately prior to their death. Therefore, you would also have had access to the concessions had you disposed of the property within two years of their death.

You will only be able to apply the small business CGT concessions if the Commissioner extends the time period in which you can dispose of the property and still be able to apply the concessions.

In determining whether the discretion to allow further time would be exercised, the Commissioner has considered the following factors:

    • evidence of an acceptable explanation for the period of the extension requested (and whether it would be fair and equitable in the circumstances to provide such an extension)

    • prejudice to the Commissioner which may result from the additional time being allowed (but the mere absence of prejudice is not enough to justify the granting of an extension)

    • unsettling of people, other than the Commissioner, or of established practices

    • fairness to people in like positions and the wider public interest

    • whether any mischief is involved, and

    • consequences of the decision.

Having considered the relevant facts, the Commissioner is able to apply his discretion under subsection 152-80(3) of the ITAA 1997 and allow an extension to the time limit.