| Disclaimer This edited version has been archived due to the length of time since original publication. It should not be regarded as indicative of the ATO's current views. The law may have changed since original publication, and views in the edited version may also be affected by subsequent precedents and new approaches to the application of the law. You cannot rely on this record in your tax affairs. It is not binding and provides you with no protection (including from any underpaid tax, penalty or interest). In addition, this record is not an authority for the purposes of establishing a reasonably arguable position for you to apply to your own circumstances. For more information on the status of edited versions of private advice and reasons we publish them, see PS LA 2008/4. |
Edited version of your written advice
Authorisation Number: 1013026108193
Date of advice: 30 May 2016
Ruling
Subject: Non-commercial business losses and activity grouping
Question
Can you group your two business activities for the purpose of section 35-10(3) of the ITAA 1997?
Answer
Yes.
This ruling applies for the following periods:
Year ending 30 June 2015
The scheme commences on:
1 July 2014
Relevant facts and circumstances
You are carrying on two business activities, one under a partnership arrangement and one as a sole trader.
You manage both businesses.
The businesses are located close to each other, and therefore they use common plant and equipment, and labour.
During the 2014-15 financial year the partnership business made a tax loss. However the sole trader business was profitable.
Relevant legislative provisions
Income Tax Assessment Act 1997 Subsection 35-10(3)
Reasons for decision
For the 2009-10 and later financial years, Division 35 of the Income Tax Assessment Act 1997 (ITAA 1997) will apply to defer a non-commercial loss from a business activity unless:
• you satisfy the income requirement and you pass one of the four tests
• the exceptions apply
• the Commissioner exercises his discretion.
Subsection 35-10(3) of the ITAA 1997 states you may group together business activities of a similar kind in applying Division 35.
In relation to your case, we accept your assertion that both activities are businesses in their own right.
Taxation Ruling TR 2001/14 considers the operation of Division 35 of the ITAA 1997, and states at paragraph 51: what will be a business activity 'of a similar kind' to another business activity is very much a question of fact and degree. The question will involve a comparison of the relevant characteristics of each, for example:
• the location(s) where they are carried on;
• the type(s) of goods and/or services provided;
• the market(s) conditions in which those goods and/or services are traded;
• the type(s) of assets employed in each; and
• any other features affecting the manner in which they are conducted.
Some of these characteristics may be the same for the business activities being compared, however, some difference must always be expected. The presence or absence of similarity in respect of a single characteristic will rarely be determinative (Goodfellow v. FC of T 77 ATC 4086 at 4094; (1977) 7 ATR 265 at 274). As overall comparison of the separate business activities will be called for, weighing up the extent of the characteristics which are the same or similar against those where there are significant differences.
In application to your case, you carry on business activities under both a partnership and sole trader arrangement. Both activities are carried out in close geographical location and therefore use common plant and equipment and labour.
It is therefore considered that these two activities are of a similar kind and are able to be grouped together under section 35-10(3) of the ITAA 1997.