| Disclaimer This edited version has been archived due to the length of time since original publication. It should not be regarded as indicative of the ATO's current views. The law may have changed since original publication, and views in the edited version may also be affected by subsequent precedents and new approaches to the application of the law. You cannot rely on this record in your tax affairs. It is not binding and provides you with no protection (including from any underpaid tax, penalty or interest). In addition, this record is not an authority for the purposes of establishing a reasonably arguable position for you to apply to your own circumstances. For more information on the status of edited versions of private advice and reasons we publish them, see PS LA 2008/4. |
Edited version of your written advice
Authorisation Number: 1013104223151
Date of advice: 10 October 2016
Ruling
Subject: Assessability of your lump sum compensation payment
Question 1
Is any part of your lump sum compensation payment assessable income?
Answer
No.
Question 2
Is there a capital gain with the compensation payment you received?
Answer
No.
This ruling applies for the following period:
Year ending 30 June 2016
The scheme commences on:
1 July 2015
Relevant facts and circumstances
You were involved in an accident.
You pursued a workplace injury compensation claim with WorkCover.
You agreed to a settlement of a lump sum payment offered by the insurance provider.
Relevant legislative provisions
Income Tax Assessment Act 1997 Section 6-5
Income Tax Assessment Act 1997 Section 6-10
Income Tax Assessment Act 1997 Section 10-5
Income Tax Assessment Act 1997 Section 102-5
Income Tax Assessment Act 1997 Paragraph 118-37(1)(a)
Further information
The legal expense you incurred in order to obtain the compensation payment for your workplace injury are capital in nature and are not an allowable deduction under section 8-1 of the ITAA 1997.
Reasons for decision
Section 6-5 of the Income Tax Assessment Act 1997 (ITAA 1997) provides that the assessable income of a taxpayer includes income according to ordinary concepts (ordinary income).
Ordinary income has generally been held to include three categories, namely, income from rendering personal services, income from property and income from carrying on a business.
Other characteristics of income that have evolved from case law include receipts that:
• are earned
• are expected
• are relied upon, and
• have an element of periodicity, recurrence or regularity.
The compensation you received was not income from rendering personal services, income from property or income from carrying on a business.
The payment is also a one off payment and thus it does not have an element of recurrence or regularity.
Compensation receipts which substitute for income have been held by the courts to be income under ordinary concepts. However no component of the amount you received was received to compensate for loss of income. The portion relating to economic loss is compensation for loss of earning capacity (a capital asset) rather than for actual loss of income.
Accordingly, no part of the lump sum compensation payment is assessable under section 6-5 of the ITAA 1997.
Capital gains
Additionally, paragraph 118-37(1)(a)(ii) of the ITAA 1997 needs to be considered as this operates to disregard a capital gain or capital loss from a capital gains tax (CGT) event which relates directly to compensation or damages received for any wrong or injury suffered by a person personally.
Accordingly, in your case, the compensation received was for an injury suffered by you. The 'injury' suffered for the purposes of paragraphs 118-37(1)(a) or (b) of the ITAA 1997 is the loss that you have suffered and therefore, the lump sum payment is exempt from CGT.
In conclusion, you will not be subject to capital gains tax in respect of the amount you received to compensate you for the injuries you received.