| Disclaimer This edited version has been archived due to the length of time since original publication. It should not be regarded as indicative of the ATO's current views. The law may have changed since original publication, and views in the edited version may also be affected by subsequent precedents and new approaches to the application of the law. You cannot rely on this record in your tax affairs. It is not binding and provides you with no protection (including from any underpaid tax, penalty or interest). In addition, this record is not an authority for the purposes of establishing a reasonably arguable position for you to apply to your own circumstances. For more information on the status of edited versions of private advice and reasons we publish them, see PS LA 2008/4. |
Edited version of your written advice
Authorisation Number: 1013139447178
Date of advice: 14 December 2016
Ruling
Subject: Legal expenses
Question
Are you entitled to a deduction for the legal fees incurred from the date of the appeal of the court decision?
Answer
No.
This ruling applies for the following periods
Year ended 30 June 2015
Year ended 30 June 2016
The scheme commences on
1 July 2014
Relevant facts and circumstances
You are the owner of a rental property.
Legal action was commenced against you.
The court ruled that you were to transfer the property to another entity.
You subsequently lodged an appeal shortly after the decision however an out of court settlement was reached via a deed of settlement and release that was finalised resulting in the ownership of the property not being transferred to the other entity as previously ruled.
Relevant legislative provisions
Income Tax Assessment Act 1997 section 8-1
Reasons for decision
Section 8-1 of the Income Tax Assessment Act 1997 (ITAA 1997) allows a deduction for all losses and outgoings to the extent to which they are incurred in gaining or producing assessable income except where the outgoings are of a capital, private or domestic nature.
Where an outgoing is of a capital nature in relation to the acquisition of a CGT asset, it will be accounted for under section 110-25 of the ITAA 1997, which includes subsection 110-25(6) for capital expenditure incurred to establish title to an asset or a right over an asset.
In determining whether a deduction is allowable under section 8-1 of the ITAA 1997, the nature of the expenditure must be considered (Hallstroms Pty Ltd v. Federal Commissioner of Taxation (1946) 72 CLR 634; 8 ATD 190; 3 AITR 436 per Dixon J). The nature or character of the legal expenses follows the advantage which is sought to be gained by incurring the expenses.
Where legal expenses arise as a consequence of the day to day activities of a business or income earning activity, the object of the expenditure is devoted towards a revenue end and the legal expenses are deductible (Herald and Weekly Times v. Federal Commissioner of Taxation (1932) 48 CLR 113; 2 ATD 169).
However, where the expenditure is devoted towards a structural rather than an operational purpose, the expenditure is of a capital nature and the expenses are not deductible (Sun Newspapers Ltd v. FC of T (1938) 61 CLR 337; 5 ATD 87; (1938) 1 AITR 403).
In your case, you incurred legal expenses to appeal a court decision that required you to transfer ownership of your rental property to another entity. While we acknowledge that you were able to retain the income stream from the property, it is considered that the legal expenses were incurred in protecting the underlying profit yielding structure of an asset. That is, they were incurred defending your title to the asset. Consequently, the expenses are capital in nature and are not deductible under section 8-1 of the ITAA 1997.