| Disclaimer This edited version has been archived due to the length of time since original publication. It should not be regarded as indicative of the ATO's current views. The law may have changed since original publication, and views in the edited version may also be affected by subsequent precedents and new approaches to the application of the law. You cannot rely on this record in your tax affairs. It is not binding and provides you with no protection (including from any underpaid tax, penalty or interest). In addition, this record is not an authority for the purposes of establishing a reasonably arguable position for you to apply to your own circumstances. For more information on the status of edited versions of private advice and reasons we publish them, see PS LA 2008/4. |
Edited version of your written advice
Authorisation Number: 1051295274160
Disclaimer
You cannot rely on this edited version in your tax affairs. You can only rely on the advice that we have given to you or to someone acting on your behalf.
The advice in the Register has been edited and may not contain all the factual details relevant to each decision. Do not use the Register to predict ATO policy or decisions.
Date of advice: 14 October 2017
Ruling
Question
Will the Commissioner exercise his discretion under subsection 118-195(1) of the Income Tax Assessment Act 1997 (ITAA 1997) and allow an extension of time to the two year period?
Answer
Yes
Having considered your circumstances and the relevant factors, the Commissioner is able to apply his discretion under subsection 118-195(1) of the ITAA 1997 and allow an extension of time. Further information on the relevant factors and inheriting a dwelling generally can be found on our website ato.gov.au and entering Quick Code QC52250 into the search bar at the top right of the page.
This ruling applies for the following period:
Year ended 30 June 2017
The scheme commences on:
1 July 2016
Relevant facts and circumstances
The property was purchased in 197X and was the main residence of the deceased until their death in August 20XX. The property was originally purchased by the deceased and their spouse who died in 19XX. The deceased became the 100% owner of the property on their spouse’s death.
The deceased’s child moved into the property for a year before they died in August 20XX. The child was one of three children who were entitled to the property on the deceased’s death. The child died intestate which resulted in delays in the administration of their estate.
The remaining family members had to deal with the administration of two estates following the death of two family members in a short period of time.
The deceased’s child died intestate and it took significant time to complete letters of administration. The current administrator of the estate was appointed in 20XX.
The original title to the property was lost and a replacement was not obtained until early 20XX.
The property has never been used to produce assessable income.
The property was vacant from the deceased’s child’s death until the property was sold with settlement date December 20XX.
Relevant legislative provisions
Income Tax Assessment Act 1997 section 118-195