| Disclaimer This edited version has been archived due to the length of time since original publication. It should not be regarded as indicative of the ATO's current views. The law may have changed since original publication, and views in the edited version may also be affected by subsequent precedents and new approaches to the application of the law. You cannot rely on this record in your tax affairs. It is not binding and provides you with no protection (including from any underpaid tax, penalty or interest). In addition, this record is not an authority for the purposes of establishing a reasonably arguable position for you to apply to your own circumstances. For more information on the status of edited versions of private advice and reasons we publish them, see PS LA 2008/4. |
Edited version of your written advice
Authorisation Number: 1051302130508
Disclaimer
You cannot rely on this edited version in your tax affairs. You can only rely on the advice that we have given to you or to someone acting on your behalf.
The advice in the Register has been edited and may not contain all the factual details relevant to each decision. Do not use the Register to predict ATO policy or decisions.
Date of advice: 31 October 2017
Ruling
Subject: CGT event E1 and E2 - changes to the terms of a trust
Issue 1
Unless otherwise stated, all legislative references under Issue 1 are to the Income Tax Assessment Act 1997.
Question 1
Will CGT event E1 or CGT event E2 in sections 104-55 and 104-60 of the Income Tax Assessment Act 1997 happen as a result of the Proposed Changes?
Answer
No.
This ruling applies for the following period:
1 July 20xx to 30 June 20xx
The scheme commenced on:
1 July 20xx
Relevant facts and circumstances
This ruling is based on the facts stated in the description of the scheme that is set out below. If your circumstances are materially different from these facts, this ruling has no effect and you cannot rely on it. The fact sheet has more information about relying on your private ruling.
The trustee of the XYZ Trust proposes to make changes to its deed (the Proposed Changes).
The Proposed Changes will be made pursuant to the power of amendment provided within the XYZ Trust deed.
Relevant legislative provisions
Income Tax Assessment Act 1997 section 104-55
Income Tax Assessment Act 1997 section 104-60
Reasons for decision
The Proposed Changes will be made pursuant to the power of amendment provided within the XYZ Trust deed.
Taxation Determination TD 2012/21 Income tax: does CGT event E1 or E2 in sections 104-55 or 104-60 of the Income Tax Assessment Act 1997 happen if the terms of a trust are changed pursuant to a valid exercise of a power contained within the trust’s constituent document, or varied with the approval of a relevant court? contains the Commissioner's position in relation to CGT event E1 or E2 and the creation of a trust over CGT assets.
In most cases, provided the trustee validly exercises an existing power of amendment under the trust deed, or the trust deed is amended with the approval of the Court, CGT event E1 or E2 will not occur
TD 2012/21 also confirms that changes to a trust will not result in CGT event E1 or E2 happening unless:
● the change causes the existing trust to terminate and a new trust to arise for trust law purposes, or
● the change results in an asset being settled on the terms of a different trust.
Will the Proposed Changes cause the XYZ Trust to terminate for trust law purposes?
Pursuant to paragraph 1 of TD 2012/21, neither CGT event E1 nor CGT event E2 happens if the terms of a trust are changed pursuant to a valid exercise of a power contained within the trust's constituent document unless the change causes the existing trust to terminate and a new trust to arise for trust law purposes.
As explained by paragraph 21 of TD 2012/21, the approach adopted by the Full Federal Court in Federal Commissioner of Taxation v. Commercial Nominees of Australia Ltd [1999] FCA 1455; 99 ATC 5115; (1999) 43 ATR 42, as made clear by Edmonds and Gordon JJ in their joint reasons for judgment in Commissioner of Taxation v. David Clark; Commissioner of Taxation v. Helen Clark [2011] FCAFC 5; 2011 ATC 20-236; (2011) 79 ATR 550:
…is authority for the proposition that assuming there is some continuity of property and membership of the trust, an amendment to the trust that is made in proper exercise of a power of amendment contained under the deed will not have the result of terminating the trust, irrespective of the extent of the amendments so made so long as the amendments are properly supported by the power.
The Commissioner is satisfied that the Proposed Changes will not cause the XYZ Trust to terminate for trust law purposes.
Will the Proposed Changes result in an asset of the XYZ Trust being settled on the terms of a different trust?
Pursuant to paragraph 1 of TD 2012/21, neither CGT event E1 nor CGT event E2 happens if the terms of a trust are changed pursuant to a valid exercise of a power contained within the trust's constituent document unless the effect of the change is such as to lead to a particular asset being subject to a separate charter of rights and obligations such as to give rise to the conclusion that that asset has been settled on the terms of a different trust.
The Commissioner is satisfied that the Proposed Changes do not result in an asset of the XYZ Trust being subject to a separate charter of rights and obligations such as to give rise to the conclusion that an asset of the XYZ Trust has been settled on the terms of a different trust.
Conclusion
Accordingly, CGT event E1 or E2 in sections 104-55 and 104-60 will not happen as a result of the Proposed Changes because:
● the Proposed Changes will not cause the XYZ Trust to terminate for trust law purposes, and
● the Proposed Changes will not result in an asset of the XYZ Trust being settled on the terms of a different trust.