Disclaimer This edited version has been archived due to the length of time since original publication. It should not be regarded as indicative of the ATO's current views. The law may have changed since original publication, and views in the edited version may also be affected by subsequent precedents and new approaches to the application of the law. You cannot rely on this record in your tax affairs. It is not binding and provides you with no protection (including from any underpaid tax, penalty or interest). In addition, this record is not an authority for the purposes of establishing a reasonably arguable position for you to apply to your own circumstances. For more information on the status of edited versions of private advice and reasons we publish them, see PS LA 2008/4. |
Edited version of your written advice
Authorisation Number: 1051430803901
Date of advice: 27 September 2018
Ruling
Subject: Part IVA of the ITAA 1936
Question 1
Will the Commissioner seek to make a determination that Part IVA of the Income Tax Assessment Act 1936 applies to include an amount in the assessable income of Company A due to CGT event A1 not happening as a result of an agreement with Company B to rescind for no consideration Contract A and Contract B.
Answer
No.
This ruling applies for the following period:
Income tax year ended 30 June 20xx.
Relevant facts and circumstances
Company A is an Australian resident for tax purposes.
Company A as vendor and Company B as purchaser entered into Contract A and Contract B.
Contract A
Contract A was a contract for the sale of various assets. Company A provided Contract A.
Contract B
Contract B was a contract for the sale of various assets. Company A provided Contract B.
Assumption
Company A and Company B will enter into an agreement to discharge, for no consideration, their obligations under Contract A and Contract B.
Relevant legislative provisions
Income Tax Assessment Act 1936 Part IVA
Income Tax Assessment Act 1936 section 177A
Income Tax Assessment Act 1936 section 177C
Income Tax Assessment Act 1936 section 177CB
Income Tax Assessment Act 1936 subsection 177D(2)
Income Tax Assessment Act 1936 subsection 177F(1)
Reasons for decision
Law Administration Practice Statement PS LA 2005/24 Application of General Anti-Avoidance Rules (PS LA 2005/24) deals with the application of the general anti-avoidance rules, including Part IVA of the ITAA 1936. Before the Commissioner can exercise his discretion to make a determination in respect of Part IVA under subsection 177F(1) of the ITAA 1936, three requirements must be met:
1. there must be a scheme within the meaning of section 177A of the ITAA 1936;
2. a tax benefit must arise based on whether a tax effect would have occurred, or might reasonably be expected to have occurred, if the scheme had not been entered into or carried out; and
3. having regard to the matters in subsection 177D(2) of the ITAA 1936, the scheme is one to which Part IVA of the ITAA 1936 applies (dominant purpose).
The Commissioner has considered these three requirements and will not seek to make a determination that Part IVA of the ITAA 1936 applies to include in the assessable income of Company A the whole or a part of the amount of assessable income that would have been included in the assessable income of Company A had CGT event A1 happened if Contract A and Contract B had not been rescinded for no consideration.