Edited version of your written advice

Authorisation Number: 1051453740603

Date of advice: 12 November 2018

Ruling

Subject: Early stage innovation company

Question

Does X Pty Ltd qualify as an early stage innovation company under the principles-based innovation test in Division 360 of the Income Tax Assessment Act 1997?

Answer

Yes

This ruling applies for the following period

Income year ending 30 June 20xx

The scheme commences on

1 July 20xx

Relevant facts and circumstances

X Pty Ltd (X) was incorporated in Australia during the 20xx income year.

X had no income or expenses in the income year ended 30 June 20xx.

X is not listed on any stock exchange.

Z Pty Ltd (Z) is X’s 100% subsidiary and was incorporated in Australia during the 20xx year of income.

Z had total income of less than $200,000 in the income year ended 30 June 20xx.

Z had total expenses of less than $1 million in the income year ended 30 June 20xx.

Z is not listed on any stock exchange.

X is developing an innovation which will be unique within their particular target industry, offering something that has not previously been available.

X has provided the reasons that it considers it to be highly innovative.

It is anticipated that this innovation will be sought after within the industry in Australia, but also by other stake holders and some regulatory bodies.

The innovation has the ability to be used in the global market.

X is seeking eligibility to qualify as an Early Stage Innovation Company (ESIC) under the principles-based innovation test.

Relevant legislative provisions

Income Tax Assessment Act 1997 Subdivision 360-A

Income Tax Assessment Act 1997 section 360-40

Reasons for decision

Summary

X meets the requirements to become an Early Stage Innovation Company (ESIC) under section 360-40 of the Income Tax Assessment Act 1997 (ITAA 1997).

Detailed reasoning

Subsection 360-40(1) of the ITAA 1997 outlines the criteria required for a company to qualify as an ESIC at a particular time in an income year. This time is referred to as the ‘test time’. The criteria are based on a series of tests to identify if the company is at an early stage of its development and it is developing new or significantly improved innovations to generate an economic return.

The early stage test requirements are outlined in detail within paragraphs 360-40(1)(a) to (d) of the ITAA 1997.

Incorporation or Registration

To meet the requirement in paragraph 360-40(1)(a) of the ITAA 1997, at a particular time (the test time) in an income year (the current year) the company must have been either:

● incorporated in Australia within the last three income years (the latest being the current year); or

● incorporated in Australia within the last six income years (the latest being the current year), and across the last three of those income years the company and its 100% subsidiaries incurred total expenses of $1 million or less; or

● registered in the Australian Business Register (ABR) within the last three income years (the latest being the current year).

X was incorporated during the 20xx income year and thus meets the first requirement above.

Total expenses

To meet the requirement in paragraph 360-40(1)(b) of the ITAA 1997, the company and its 100% subsidiaries must have incurred total expenses of $1 million or less in the income year before the current year.

X meets this requirement as it incurred nil expenditure and Z (its operating subsidiary) incurred expenditure less than $1 million in the 20xx income year.

Assessable income

To meet the requirement in paragraph 360-40(1)(c) of the ITAA 1997, the company and its 100% subsidiaries must have derived total assessable income of $200,000 or less in the income year before the current year.

This requirement is satisfied as X derived nil assessable income and Z (its operating subsidiary) derived total income of less than $200,000 in the 20xx income year.

No stock exchange listing

To meet the requirement in paragraph 360-40(1)(d) of the ITAA 1997, the company must not be listed on any stock exchange in Australia or a foreign country.

This requirement is satisfied as X and Z are not listed on any stock exchange in any country.

Innovation tests

In accordance with paragraph 360-140(1)(e), if the company satisfies the early stage test, the company must also satisfy one of two innovation tests: the objective (100 point) test or the principles-based test.

‘100 point test’

X is not seeking eligibility under this test to quality as an ESIC.

‘Principles-based test’

To satisfy the principles-based test, a company must meet five requirements in paragraph 360-40(1)(e) of the ITAA 1997. This is tested at a time immediately after the relevant new shares are issued to the investor.

A company can demonstrate that it meets each requirement through existing documentation such as a business plan, commercialisation strategy, competition analysis or other company documents. A company must be able to show that tangible steps have been or will be taken in relation to each of the requirements.

The five requirements of the principles-based test, as outlined in paragraph 360-40(1)(e) of the ITAA 1997 are:

● the company must be genuinely focused on developing one or more new or significantly improved innovations for commercialisation

● the business relating to that innovation must have a high growth potential

● the company must demonstrate that it has the potential to be able to successfully scale up the business relating to the innovation

● the company must demonstrate that it has the potential to be able to address a broader than local market, including global markets, through that business, and

● the company must demonstrate that it has the potential to be able to have competitive advantages for that business.

Developing new or significantly improved innovations for commercialisation

For the purposes of Subdivision 360-A of the ITAA 1997, the Explanatory Memorandum to the Tax Laws Amendment (Tax Incentives for Innovation) Bill 2016 (‘EM’) provides the following at paragraph 1.76 in relation to the definition of innovation:

Implicit in the definition of innovation is the requirement that the company is developing a new or significantly improved type of innovation such as a product, process, service, marketing or organisational method. This list of various types of innovations provides flexibility for innovation companies and is adaptable to current and future innovations. The Oslo Manual, published by the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) provides a description of these different types of innovations…

The innovation being developed by the company must either be new or significantly improved for an applicable addressable market. The company’s addressable market is the revenue opportunity or market demand arising from the innovation or the related business. The addressable market must be objective and realistic.

Improvements must be significant in nature to meet this requirement. Customising existing products or minor changes resulting from software updates, pricing strategies or seasonal changes are examples of improvements that would not be considered significant.

The OECD Oslo Manual defines innovations as significant changes, with the intention of distinguishing significant changes from routine minor changes. However, it is important to recognise that an innovation can also consist of a series of smaller incremental changes that together constitute a significant change.

In discussing services innovation activity, paragraph 111 of the OECD Oslo Manual states:

Innovation activity in services also tends to be a continuous process, consisting of a series of incremental changes in products and processes. This may occasionally complicate the identification of innovations in services in terms of single events, i.e. as the implementation of a significant change in products, processes or other methods.

The OECD Oslo Manual, in relation to defining innovative services, states at paragraph 161 that:

innovations in services can include significant improvements in how they are provided (for example, in terms of their efficiency or speed), the addition of new functions or characteristics to existing services, or the introduction of entirely new services.

The company must be genuinely focused on developing the innovation for a commercial purpose in order to generate economic value and revenue for the company. This requirement draws the distinction between simply having an idea and commercialising an idea.

‘Commercialisation’ includes a range of activities that involve the implementation or sale of a new or significantly improved innovation that will directly lead to the generation of economic value for the company.

High growth potential

The company must be able to demonstrate that it has the potential for high growth within a broad addressable market. This refers to the company’s ability to rapidly expand its business. Companies that are limited to supplying local customers will not meet this requirement.

Scalability

The company must be able to demonstrate that it has the potential to successfully scale up the business. The company must have operating leverage, where as it increases its market share or enters into new markets, its existing revenues can be multiplied with a reduced or minimal increase in operating costs per unit.

Broader than local market

The company must be able to demonstrate that it has the potential to address a market that is broader than a local city, area or region. The company does not need to have a serviceable market at a national, multinational or global scale at the test time. However, it does need to show that the business is capable of addressing a market that is broader than a local market and that the business can be adapted to a broader scale in the future.

Competitive advantages

The company must be able to demonstrate that it has the potential to have competitive advantages, such as a cost or differential advantage over its competitors which are sustainable for the business as it expands. The company can analyse what competitors in the market offer, and consider whether the company has a differentiating advantage that would allow it to outperform these competitors.

Application of the ‘principles-based test’ to your circumstances

The company must be genuinely focused on developing one or more new or significantly improved innovations for commercialisation

After consideration of all the information provided, it can be concluded that X is genuinely focussed on developing its new innovation for commercialisation.

The business relating to that innovation must have a high growth potential

X can show that its innovation has a high growth potential.

The company must demonstrate that it has the potential to be able to successfully scale up the business relating to the innovation

X has demonstrated it has the potential to be able to successfully scale up the business.

The company must demonstrate that it has the potential to be able to address a broader than local market, including global markets, through that business

X’s platform has the potential to be able to address broader and global markets.

The company must demonstrate that it has the potential to be able to have competitive advantages for that business

X believes it has a competitive advantage. The product they will be offering is not a service that is able to be offered by anyone else within that industry.

X’s product will be an easy to use and cost effective option, the only one of its kind.

X can demonstrate it has the potential to be able to have competitive advantages for that business.

Conclusion on the principles-based test

X satisfies the principles-based test as it satisfies the requirements within subparagraphs 360-40(1)(e)(i) to (v) of the ITAA 1997 for the period commencing 1 July 20xx until 30 June 20xx, or until the date the innovation has been fully developed, whichever occurs earlier.

Overall conclusion

X meets the eligibility criteria of an ESIC under section 360-40 of the ITAA 1997 for the period commencing 1 July 20xx until 30 June 20xx, or until the date the innovation has been fully developed, whichever occurs earlier.