| Disclaimer This edited version has been archived due to the length of time since original publication. It should not be regarded as indicative of the ATO's current views. The law may have changed since original publication, and views in the edited version may also be affected by subsequent precedents and new approaches to the application of the law. You cannot rely on this record in your tax affairs. It is not binding and provides you with no protection (including from any underpaid tax, penalty or interest). In addition, this record is not an authority for the purposes of establishing a reasonably arguable position for you to apply to your own circumstances. For more information on the status of edited versions of private advice and reasons we publish them, see PS LA 2008/4. |
Edited version of your written advice
Authorisation Number: 1051476589853
Date of advice: 23 January 2019
Ruling
Subject: Capital gains tax – liquidation – final distribution – court action – deed of settlement – realise capital loss
Question
Did CGT event C2 occur on XX XXX 20XX when the settlement deed was entered into by the plaintiffs and Company B Limited?
Answer
Yes.
It is considered that on the XX XXX 20XX a contract was entered into to that resulted in the ending of the asset owned by you. As a result you are able to realise the capital loss or capital gain as this point.
This ruling applies for the following period
Year ended 30 June 2018.
The scheme commences on
1 July 2017.
Relevant facts and circumstances
Individual A invested a total of $XXX,XXX in Notes issued by Company A in three separate transactions.
● $XXX,XXX of Notes purchased on or before Date A (Notes A); and
● $XXX,XXX of Notes purchased on or after Date B (Notes B).
A few years after Individual A purchased the Notes administrators were appointed to Company A.
Approximately six and 12 months after the administrators were appointed to Company A, distributions were made to secured noteholders, this included Individual A.
Sometime later Individual A passed away.
A few months after Individual A passed away a further distribution was made to secured noteholders; this included the estate of individual A (the estate).
After the third distribution, the Administrators did not anticipate further distributions unless further funding was secured to pursue the claim.
Approximately 12 months after the third distribution was made a class action was commenced in the Federal Court of Australia against the trustee for Company A Note Scheme, Company B Limited which you were a part of.
A short time later the plaintiffs and Company B Limited entered into a Confidential Deed of Settlement (the Deed).
A Notice of Estimated Distribution was received by the estate regarding it’s share of the settlement scheme proceeds.
The Deed stated the estate will receive an estimated distribution of $XXX,XXX.XX consisting of:
● $XX,XXX.XX for Notes A; and
● $XX,XXX.XX for Notes B.
Paragraph XX of the Deed stated:
‘you will, however, be bound by the terms of the settlement and will not be able to make any claim against Company B Limited in respect of or relating to the subject matter of the Company A Class Action’
Paragraph XX of the Deed stated:
‘if approved the settlement will bind all group members (other than those who have previously opted out of the proceedings). This means that no Group member will be able to take further action against Company B Limited in relation to the subject matter of the proceeding if the settlement is approved by the court’.
A short time later the Federal Court of Australia approved the settlement deed.
Relevant legislative provisions
Income Tax Assessment Act 1997 section 100-20
Income Tax Assessment Act 1997 section 104-25