| Disclaimer This edited version has been archived due to the length of time since original publication. It should not be regarded as indicative of the ATO's current views. The law may have changed since original publication, and views in the edited version may also be affected by subsequent precedents and new approaches to the application of the law. You cannot rely on this record in your tax affairs. It is not binding and provides you with no protection (including from any underpaid tax, penalty or interest). In addition, this record is not an authority for the purposes of establishing a reasonably arguable position for you to apply to your own circumstances. For more information on the status of edited versions of private advice and reasons we publish them, see PS LA 2008/4. |
Edited version of your written advice
Authorisation Number: 1051493907000
Date of advice: 15 March 2019
Ruling
Subject: Residency
Question 1
Is Company A, a resident of Australia for tax purposes?
Answer
No.
Is Company A, a prescribed dual resident?
Answer
No
This ruling applies for the following periods:
Year ended 30 June 2019
Year ended 30 June 2020
Year ended 30 June 2021
Year ended 30 June 2022
The scheme commences on:
1 July 2018
Relevant facts and circumstances
Company A is a wholly owned subsidiary of Company B (an Australian incorporated company) which is wholly owned by the Trust. The trustee of the Trust is Company C which is an Australian incorporated company.
Two individuals are the sole directors of Company B and Company C.
Company A was incorporated overseas.
At the time of incorporation, the directors of Company A were all foreign residents and included the two individuals (former Australian residents) who were not Australian tax residents at the time.
The two individuals have been the sole directors of Company A since the foreign directors resigned.
The two individuals returned to Australia to reside.
Company A’s only asset is an overseas commercial property its sole source of income is rent from the property.
Company A has not, and does not, derive income from Australian sources or conduct any business activities in Australia.
Relevant legislative provisions
Income Tax Assessment Act 1936 Subsection 6(1)
Reasons for decision
Subsection 6(1) of the Income Tax Assessment Act 1936 (ITAA 1936) states that a company is a resident of Australia for taxation purposes if:
● it is incorporated in Australia, or
● although not incorporated in Australia, it carries on business in Australia, and has either:
● its central management and control in Australia, or
● its voting power controlled by shareholders who are residents of Australia.
In this case, Company A was incorporated in a foreign country and its central management and control moved to Australia.
However, regardless of Company A’s central management and control moving to Australia or the residency of its shareholders being in Australia, it can only be a resident of Australia if it carries on business in Australia.
From the information provided, Company A has not, and does not, derive income from Australian sources or conduct any business activities in Australia.
Therefore, Company A has not carried on business in Australia and accordingly is not a resident of Australia for tax purposes.
As Company A is not a resident of Australia within the meaning of subsection 6(1) of the ITAA 1936, Company A is not a prescribed dual resident.