Disclaimer This edited version has been archived due to the length of time since original publication. It should not be regarded as indicative of the ATO's current views. The law may have changed since original publication, and views in the edited version may also be affected by subsequent precedents and new approaches to the application of the law. You cannot rely on this record in your tax affairs. It is not binding and provides you with no protection (including from any underpaid tax, penalty or interest). In addition, this record is not an authority for the purposes of establishing a reasonably arguable position for you to apply to your own circumstances. For more information on the status of edited versions of private advice and reasons we publish them, see PS LA 2008/4. |
Edited version of your written advice
Authorisation Number: 1051501327532
Date of advice: 11 April 2019
Ruling
Subject: Capital gains tax – small business concessions – 15 year exemption
Question
Can you disregard the gain from the sale of the property under the 15 year exemption?
Answer
Yes. The entity satisfied the basic conditions to access the small business concessions and also meets the additional conditions to access the 15 year exemption. The Commissioner also considered that the sale of the property was in connection with the retirement of a signification individual.
This ruling applies for the following period:
Year ended 30 June 2015
The scheme commences on:
Relevant facts and circumstances
The deceased acquired an original parcel of land in 19XX, and became sole owner of the land in the 19XX.
In 19XX a considerable part of this land was reduced for development purposes. This resulted in land being isolated and access became restricted to the remaining land.
The deceased had a family business on this land for many years providing customer service.
In 19XX a Government plan was introduced to this suburb and surrounding areas on the permitted developments that would take place over many years to come.
As the land had restricted access the deceased required the land zoning to be altered.
From 19XX – 19XX there was no business activity.
In 19XX the deceased passed away and left a will appointing trustees and executors. Probate was granted in 19XX.
The executors operated the business for over ten years on the land. The attempt to change the zoning on the land was still underway.
In 20XX the estate commenced turning their mind to selling the land.
In 20XX the estate entered into an agreement with the local Government.
Over a four year period the estate had to negotiate with the local Government and other infrastructure developers and corporations in an attempt to sell the property.
During this time, one of the executors’ personal circumstances changed and reduced their working hours.
The business was reducing and the rezoning issues were still unresolved. The business ceased in 20XX and the significant individual retired.
In 20XX, an offer was made but this fell through due to the uncertainty of the zoning areas. This occurred again in 20XX.
The zoning issues were resolved in 20XX.
The estate continued to market the property for sale and a contract of sale was exchanged in 20XX.
There was a significant individual for over 15 years and at the time of the CGT event; the maximum net asset value test was satisfied.
Relevant legislative provisions
Income Tax Assessment Act 1997 Section 104-10
Income Tax Assessment Act 1997 Section 152-10
Income Tax Assessment Act 1997 Section 152-35
Income Tax Assessment Act 1997 Section 152-80
Income Tax Assessment Act 1997 Section 152-110
Income Tax Assessment Act 1997 Section 152-215