Disclaimer
This edited version has been archived due to the length of time since original publication. It should not be regarded as indicative of the ATO's current views. The law may have changed since original publication, and views in the edited version may also be affected by subsequent precedents and new approaches to the application of the law.

You cannot rely on this record in your tax affairs. It is not binding and provides you with no protection (including from any underpaid tax, penalty or interest). In addition, this record is not an authority for the purposes of establishing a reasonably arguable position for you to apply to your own circumstances. For more information on the status of edited versions of private advice and reasons we publish them, see PS LA 2008/4.

Edited version of private advice

Authorisation Number: 1051563291804

Date of advice: 15 August 2019

Ruling

Subject: Marriage breakdown - property beneficial ownership

Question

Are you required to declare any capital gain or loss made on the sale of the property where you have no beneficial ownership?

Answer

No

In this case, there is sufficient evidence to establish that the equitable interest is different from the legal title. It is accepted that as a result of the court order, your equitable interest is different from your legal interest in the property. Any gain or loss in relation to the sale of the property in 20XX should not be declared by you as you do not hold an equitable interest in the property.

This ruling applies for the following period:

Year ended 30 June 20XX

The scheme commences on:

1 July 20XX

Relevant facts and circumstances

After 20 September 1985, you bought a property in Australia (the property) with your spouse as joint tenants.

You are both resident of Australia.

You separated from your spouse and on a specific date and under a court order, ownership of the property was given to your ex-spouse.

Legal ownership of the property was never transferred to your ex-spouse's name, however the orders also detail that your ex-spouse is responsible for the outgoing in relation to the property.

Your ex-spouse paid all the expenses related to the ownership of the property. You did not receive any benefit from the property.

The property was subsequently sold. All proceeds went to your ex-spouse. The property was sold at a loss.

Relevant legislative provisions

Income Tax Assessment Act 1997 Section 102-20

Income Tax Assessment Act 1997 Section 104-10

Income Tax Assessment Act 1997 Section 106-50

Income Tax Assessment Act 1997 Section 108-5