| Disclaimer This edited version has been archived due to the length of time since original publication. It should not be regarded as indicative of the ATO's current views. The law may have changed since original publication, and views in the edited version may also be affected by subsequent precedents and new approaches to the application of the law. You cannot rely on this record in your tax affairs. It is not binding and provides you with no protection (including from any underpaid tax, penalty or interest). In addition, this record is not an authority for the purposes of establishing a reasonably arguable position for you to apply to your own circumstances. For more information on the status of edited versions of private advice and reasons we publish them, see PS LA 2008/4. |
Edited version of private advice
Authorisation Number: 1051623950544
NOTICE
This edited version has been found to be misleading or incorrect. It does not represent the ATO’s view of the relevant law.
This notice must not be taken to imply anything about:
● the binding nature of the private advice issued to the applicant
● the correctness of other edited versions.
Edited versions cannot be relied upon as precedent or used for determining how the ATO will apply the law in other cases.
Date of advice: 10 January 2020
Ruling
Subject: Deceased estates
Question
Will the Commissioner exercise his discretion under subsection 118-195(1) of the Income Tax Assessment Act 1997 (ITAA 1997) and allow an extension of time to the two year period?
Answer
Yes.
As essential requirement of applying subsection 118-195(1) of the ITAA 1997 is that a dwelling exists on the land.
Section 118-160 of the ITAA 1997 states that if a dwelling that was your main residence is accidently destroyed and a capital gains tax (CGT) event happens in relation to the land on which it was built without you erecting another dwelling on the land, you can choose to apply the main residence exemption to the land, as if the dwelling had not been destroyed and was still your main residence.
In this way you can treat the disposal of the property as if you had disposed of a dwelling that was your main residence.
Having considered your circumstances and the relevant factors, the Commissioner will allow an extension of time. Further information about this discretion can be found by searching 'QC 52250' on ato.gov.au
This ruling applies for the following period:
Year ending 30 June 2020
The scheme commences on:
1 July 2019
Relevant facts and circumstances
The deceased purchased a property (the dwelling) in joint names with their spouse sometime before 20 September 1985.
They lived in the dwelling as their main residence.
The land does not exceed two hectares.
It has never been used to produce assessable income.
The deceased's spouse passed away after 20 September 1985.
The spouse's ownership interest passed to the deceased.
The deceased now had two ownership interests in the dwelling, their original interest and the interest received from their spouse upon their death.
The deceased continued to live in the dwelling as their main residence.
On the day of the deceased's death, the market value of the property was approximately $X!
A disaster demolished the home and the deceased passed away.
Once the coroner's report was completed, insurance related issues were addressed, council requirements needed to be met, personal effects were salvaged from the wreckage, and the remains of the home were bulldozed.
Two insurance payouts were received, one for house contents and one for the building and removal of the wreckage.
The property was sold by the trustees of the estate.
It was sold as a vacant block.
Contracts were exchanged and settlement occurred in 20XX, over two years after the deceased's date of death.
Relevant legislative provisions
Income Tax Assessment Act 1997 section 118-160
Income Tax Assessment Act 1997 section 118-195