Disclaimer You cannot rely on this record in your tax affairs. It is not binding and provides you with no protection (including from any underpaid tax, penalty or interest). In addition, this record is not an authority for the purposes of establishing a reasonably arguable position for you to apply to your own circumstances. For more information on the status of edited versions of private advice and reasons we publish them, see PS LA 2008/4. |
Edited version of private advice
Authorisation Number: 1051806771756
Date of advice: 22 February 2021
Ruling
Subject: Work related expenses
Question
Are you entitled to a deduction for the cost of a medical machine, out of pocket medical visits for a license and records?
Answer
No.
This ruling applies for the following periods:
Year ended 30 June 20XX
Year ended 30 June 20XX
The scheme commences on:
1 July 20XX
Relevant facts and circumstances
You are required to use a machine for medical reasons.
You are required to have a certificate each year to obtain a license.
You are also required to provide your employer with a report.
Relevant legislative provisions
Income Tax Assessment Act 1997 Section 8-1
Reasons for decision
Section 8-1 of the Income Tax Assessment Act 1997 (ITAA 1997) allows a deduction for all losses and outgoings to the extent to which they are incurred in gaining or producing assessable income except where the outgoings are of a capital, private or domestic nature, or relate to the earning of exempt income.
Generally medical expenses have no direct connection to the gaining or producing of assessable income. The medical expense relates to a personal medical condition and is private in nature.
Taxation Ruling IT 2217 addresses income tax deductions for medical appliances. It refers to the decision in Case Q17 83 ATC 62, where the taxpayer was a primary producer who had purchased a hearing aid so that his business associates could communicate with him in the day to day running of the business. The taxpayer argued that their hearing aid was an essential tool to enable them to carry on their business.
The Board of Review disallowed the deduction. It was held that despite the connection between the outlay and the taxpayer's income, along with the fact that the taxpayer might be unable to earn his assessable income without the aid of the relevant appliance, the outlay was not necessarily incurred in carrying on a business for the purpose of gaining or producing assessable income. The primary cause of the expenditure was for the correction of a disadvantage that was personal to the taxpayer. The expense was therefore of a private nature.
Accordingly, claims for income tax deductions in respect of expenses incurred on medical appliances, for example, wheelchairs, hearing aids, spectacles, artificial limbs and similar appliances used by persons in carrying out their duties of an employment are not allowable.
In your case you are required to use a machine.
Although the above case refers to a hearing aid this case can also be applied to your situation as the machine is a medical appliance and is used to assist with your medical problem.
However, the expense of purchasing the machine could not be considered to be incurred in gaining assessable income but, rather, it would put you in a position where you would be able to work and therefore earn assessable income.
In light of the principles and facts outlined above, the costs of a machine are private in nature. The expenses are not considered to be incurred in gaining your assessable income, but rather incurred in overcoming a medical condition. Therefore, you are not entitled to claim a deduction for this expenditure as it is private in nature.
This is the same for the medical for the license and the report. Both of these put you in a position to earn assessable income and are not incurred in the gaining or producing your assessable income. You require both the medical and the report to be able to work and the expenses are incurred at a point too soon to be in relation to the earning of your assessable income.
Therefore, they are not an allowable deduction under Section 8-1 of the ITAA 1997.