Disclaimer You cannot rely on this record in your tax affairs. It is not binding and provides you with no protection (including from any underpaid tax, penalty or interest). In addition, this record is not an authority for the purposes of establishing a reasonably arguable position for you to apply to your own circumstances. For more information on the status of edited versions of private advice and reasons we publish them, see PS LA 2008/4. |
Edited version of private advice
Authorisation Number: 1051910502841
Date of advice: 14 October 2021
Ruling
Subject: Residency - arriving
Question
Are you an Australian resident for taxation purposes from the date you left Country B?
Answer
Yes.
This ruling applies for the following period:
Year ended 30 June 20XX
The scheme commences on:
XX July 20XX
Relevant facts and circumstances
You and your spouse were born in Australia and are Australian citizens.
You purchased a property and resided there until Month 20XX.
You and your spouse were living with family and renting out the Property at normal commercial rates.
You and your spouse departed Australia in Month 20XX to reside in the Country B.
You and your spouse entered Country B on a visa.
Your intention once residing in Country B, was to apply for dual citizenship.
Prior to departing Australia, you and your spouse mainly sold your personal assets and motor vehicle and gifted items.
You and your spouse looked for work throughout several countries.
You and your spouse spent time travelling around different countries looking for employment and were able to secure full time employment in Country B.
You and your spouse leased X properties in Country B and stayed with family.
You and your spouse's initial intention was to find permanent jobs and to live in Country B long term.
You and your spouse took your personal effects to Country B and upgraded your airfares tickets to increase your baggage allowance to allow you to bring as many personal items as possible.
You and your spouse hold Country B bank accounts.
You and your spouse hold Superannuation accounts in Country B.
You and your spouse informed the Australian electoral commission that you were departing Australia.
You and your spouse didn't inform your private health insurance to suspend of cancel your policy.
You and your spouse hold an Australian bank account.
You and your spouse hold Australian Superannuation funds.
COVID 19 began and in response you left your employment and cancelled your lease agreement to head back to Australia.
You and your spouse were in Country B for a period of time and various other countries for shorter timeframes.
Your flight back to Australia was scheduled and then cancelled due to the international travel caps imposed by the Australian Government.
You and your spouse decided to travel around many countries while continually searching for a flight back to Australia.
You and your spouse arrived back to Australia on XX Month 20XX.
You and your spouse moved back into the Property on XX Month 20XX.
Relevant legislative provisions
Income Tax Assessment Act 1997 section 6-5
Income Tax Assessment Act 1936 subsection 6(1)
Income Tax Assessment Act 1997 subsection 995-1(1)
Reasons for decision
Section 995-1 of the Income tax Assessment Act 1997 (ITAA 1997) defines an Australian resident for tax purposes as a person who is a resident of Australia for the purposes of the Income Tax Assessment Act 1936 (ITAA 1936).
The terms resident and resident of Australia, as applied to an individual, are defined in subsection 6(1) of the ITAA 1936.
The definition offers four tests to ascertain whether each individual taxpayer is a resident of Australia for income tax purposes. These tests are:
• the resides test,
• the domicile test,
• the 183 day test, and
• the superannuation test.
The primary test for deciding the residency status of an individual is whether they reside in Australia according to the ordinary meaning of the word resides.
Where an individual does not reside in Australia according to ordinary concepts, they will still be an Australian resident if they meet the conditions of one of the other tests.
The resides test
The ordinary meaning of the word 'reside', according to the Macquarie Dictionary, 2001, rev. 3rd edition, The Macquarie Library Pty Ltd, NSW, is 'to dwell permanently or for a considerable time; having one's abode for a time', and according to the Compact Edition of the Oxford English Dictionary (1987), is 'to dwell permanently, or for a considerable time, to have one's settled or usual abode, to live in or at a particular place'. These definitions have been highlighted in cases as being definitive observations of the meaning of resides (see Viscount LC in Levene v Commissioners of Inland Revenue [1928] AC 217 and Logan J in Stockton v Federal Commissioner of Taxation [2019] FCA 1679).
The observations contained in the case of Hafza v Director-General of Social Security (1985) 6 FCR 444 are also important:
Physical presence and intention will coincide for most of the time. But few people are always at home. Once a person has established a home in a particular place - even involuntarily: see Commissioners of Inland Revenue v Lysaght [1928] AC 234 at 248; and Keil v Keil [1947] VLR 383 - a person does not necessarily cease to be resident there because he or she is physically absent. The test is whether the person has retained a continuity of association with the place - Levene v Inland Revenue Commissioners [1928] AC 217 at 225 and Judd v Judd (1957) 75 WN (NSW) 147 at 149 - together with an intention to return to that place and an attitude that that place remains " home ": see Norman v Norman (No 3) (1969) 16 FLR 231 at 235... [W]here the general concept is applicable, it is obvious that, as residence of a place in which a person is not physically present depends upon an intention to return and to continue to treat that place as " home ", a change of intention may be decisive of the question whether residence in a particular place has been maintained.
Case law decisions have considered the following factors in relation to whether the taxpayer was a resident under the 'resides' test:
• Physical presence
• Intention or purpose of presence
• Family and business/employment ties
• Maintenance and location of assets, and
• Social and living arrangements.
These factors are similar to those which the Commissioner has said are relevant in determining the residency status of individuals in IT 2650 and Taxation Ruling TR 98/17 Income tax: residency status of individuals entering Australia.
It is important to note that not one single factor is decisive, and the weight given to each factor depends on each individual's circumstances.
We consider that your circumstances are consistent with you residing in Australia.
Domicile test
Under the domicile test, you are a resident of Australia if your domicile is in Australia unless the Commissioner is satisfied that your permanent place of abode is outside Australia.
Domicile
Whether your domicile is Australia is determined by the Domicile Act 1982 and the common law rules on domicile.
Your domicile is your domicile of origin (usually the domicile of your father at the time of your birth) unless you have acquired a domicile of choice elsewhere. To acquire a domicile of choice of a particular country you must be lawfully present there and you must hold the positive intention to make that country your home indefinitely. Your domicile continues until you acquire a different domicile. Whether your domicile has changed depends on an objective consideration of all relevant facts.
Permanent place of abode
If you have an Australian domicile, you are an Australian resident unless the Commissioner is satisfied that your permanent place of abode is outside Australia. This is a question of fact to be determined in light of all the facts and circumstances of each case.
'Permanent' does not mean everlasting or forever, but it is to be distinguished from temporary or transitory.
The courts have held that the phrase 'permanent place of abode' calls for a consideration of the town or country where a person is located. It does not extend to more than one country, or a region of the world.
The Full Federal Court in Harding v Commissioner of Taxation [2019] FCA 29 held at paragraphs 36 and 40 that key considerations in determining whether a taxpayer has his or her permanent place of abode outside Australia are:
(a) whether the taxpayer has definitely abandoned, in a permanent way, living in Australia; and
(b) whether the taxpayer is living permanently in a specific country.
Paragraph 23 of Taxation Ruling IT 2650 Residency - Permanent place of abode outside Australia sets out the following factors which are used by the Commissioner in reaching a state of satisfaction as to a taxpayer's permanent place of abode:
(a) the intended and actual length of the taxpayer's stay in the overseas country;
(b) whether the taxpayer intended to stay in the overseas country only temporarily and then to move on to another country or to return to Australia at some definite point in time;
(c) whether the taxpayer has established a home (in the sense of dwelling place; a house or other shelter that is the fixed residence of a person, a family, or a household), outside Australia;
(d) whether any residence or place of abode exists in Australia or has been abandoned because of the overseas absence;
(e) the duration and continuity of the taxpayer's presence in the overseas country; and
(f) the durability of association that the person has with a particular place in Australia, i.e. maintaining assets in Australia, informing government departments such as the Department of Social Security that he or she is leaving permanently and that family allowance payments should be stopped, place of education of the taxpayer's children, family ties and so on.
As with the factors under the resides test, no one single factor is decisive, and the weight given to each factor depends on the individual circumstances.
The Commissioner is not satisfied that your permanent place of abode is outside Australia.
You are a resident of Australia under the domicile test outlined in the definition of 'resident' in subsection 6(1) of the ITAA 1936.
183-day test
Where a person is present in Australia for 183 days during the year of income the person will be a resident, unless the Commissioner is satisfied that the person's usual place of abode is outside Australia and the person does not intend to take up residence in Australia.
In the context of the 183- day test, a person's usual place of abode can include both a dwelling or a country where the person usually resides. A person can have only one usual place of abode under the 183- day test. However, it is also possible that a person does not have a usual place of abode. This is the person who merely travels through various countries without developing any strong connections.
If a person has places of abode both inside and outside Australia, then a comparison may need to be made to determine which is their usual place of abode. When comparing two places of abode of a particular person, it is necessary to examine the nature and quality of the use which the person makes of each particular place of abode. It may then be possible to determine which is the usual one, as distinct from the other or others which, while they may be places of abode, are not properly characterised as the person's usual place of abode (Emmett J at [78] in Federal Commissioner of Taxation v Executors of the Estate of Subrahmanyam [2001] FCA 1836).
To determine whether you intend to take up residence in Australia, we look at evidence of relevant objective facts.
Based on your circumstances, the Commissioner isn't satisfied that your usual place of abode was outside Australia for the relevant income year.
Superannuation Test
An individual is a resident of Australia if they are either a member of the superannuation scheme established by deed under the Superannuation Act 1990 or an eligible employee for the purposes of the Superannuation Act 1976, or they are the spouse, or the child under 16, of such a person.
You are not a contributing member of the Public Sector Superannuation Scheme (PSS) or the Commonwealth Superannuation Scheme (CSS) or a spouse of such a person, or a child under 16 of such a person. Therefore, you are not a resident under this test.
Conclusion
You satisfy the Resides, Domicile and 183 day tests of residency.