Disclaimer You cannot rely on this record in your tax affairs. It is not binding and provides you with no protection (including from any underpaid tax, penalty or interest). In addition, this record is not an authority for the purposes of establishing a reasonably arguable position for you to apply to your own circumstances. For more information on the status of edited versions of private advice and reasons we publish them, see PS LA 2008/4. |
Edited version of private advice
Authorisation Number: 1051928333381
Date of advice: 1 December 2021
Ruling
Subject: Residency
Question 1
Were you a resident of Australia for taxation purposes from XXX 20XX to XXX 20XX?
Answer
Yes.
Question 2
Are you a resident of Australia for taxation purposes from XXX 20XX?
Answer
No.
Question 3
Are you required to declare any income derived in country Y from XXXX 20XX in your Australian tax return
Answer
No.
This ruling applies for the following periods:
Year ended 30 June 20XX
Year ended 30 June 20XX
The scheme commences on:
1 July 20XX
Relevant facts and circumstances
You were born in Country Y.
You are a citizen of Country Y.
You commenced living and working in Australia in XXXX.
You took leave in the XXXY income year for X years.
On XXXX you and your family went to Country Y.
The purpose of the trip was to spend time with family and for your child to get to know their family in Country Y.
You initially lived with family in Country Y and then in temporary accommodation and then you moved into your own home.
On XXXX you resigned from your job in Australia.
On XXXX you formed the intention to remain in Country Y indefinitely.
You obtained employment in Country Y after your resignation.
You have social connections in Country Y along with family.
You have social connections in Australia which you are maintaining.
You and your spouse are not eligible to contribute to the PSS or the CSS Commonwealth super funds.
Relevant legislative provisions
Income Tax Assessment Act 1936 subsection 6(1)
Income Tax Assessment Act 1997 section 995-1
Reasons for decision
Section 995-1 of the Income tax Assessment Act 1997 (ITAA 1997) defines an Australian resident for tax purposes as a person who is a resident of Australia for the purposes of the Income Tax Assessment Act 1936 (ITAA 1936).
The terms resident and resident of Australia, as applied to an individual, are defined in subsection 6(1) of the ITAA 1936.
The definition offers four tests to ascertain whether each individual taxpayer is a resident of Australia for income tax purposes. These tests are:
• the resides test,
• the domicile test,
• the 183 day test, and
• the superannuation test.
The primary test for deciding the residency status of an individual is whether they reside in Australia according to the ordinary meaning of the word resides.
Where an individual does not reside in Australia according to ordinary concepts, they will still be an Australian resident if they meet the conditions of one of the other tests.
The resides test
The ordinary meaning of the word 'reside', according to the Macquarie Dictionary, 2001, rev. 3rd edition, The Macquarie Library Pty Ltd, NSW, is 'to dwell permanently or for a considerable time; having one's abode for a time', and according to the Compact Edition of the Oxford English Dictionary (1987), is 'to dwell permanently, or for a considerable time, to have one's settled or usual abode, to live in or at a particular place'. These definitions have been highlighted in cases as being definitive observations of the meaning of resides (see Viscount LC in Levene v Commissioners of Inland Revenue [1928] AC 217 and Logan J in Stockton v Federal Commissioner of Taxation [2019] FCA 1679).
The observations contained in the case of Hafza v Director-General of Social Security (1985) 6 FCR 444 are also important:
Physical presence and intention will coincide for most of the time. But few people are always at home. Once a person has established a home in a particular place - even involuntarily: see Commissioners of Inland Revenue v Lysaght [1928] AC 234 at 248; and Keil v Keil [1947] VLR 383 - a person does not necessarily cease to be resident there because he or she is physically absent. The test is whether the person has retained a continuity of association with the place - Levene v Inland Revenue Commissioners [1928] AC 217 at 225 and Judd v Judd (1957) 75 WN (NSW) 147 at 149 - together with an intention to return to that place and an attitude that that place remains " home ": see Norman v Norman (No 3) (1969) 16 FLR 231 at 235... [W]here the general concept is applicable, it is obvious that, as residence of a place in which a person is not physically present depends upon an intention to return and to continue to treat that place as " home ", a change of intention may be decisive of the question whether residence in a particular place has been maintained.
Case law decisions have considered the following factors in relation to whether the taxpayer was a resident under the 'resides' test:
• Physical presence
• Intention or purpose of presence
• Family and business/employment ties
• Maintenance and location of assets, and
• Social and living arrangements.
These factors are similar to those which the Commissioner has said are relevant in determining the residency status of individuals in IT 2650 and Taxation Ruling TR 98/17 Income tax: residency status of individuals entering Australia.
It is important to note that not one single factor is decisive, and the weight given to each factor depends on each individual's circumstances.
From XXXX to XXXX you were still connected to Australia due to your work.
You went to Country Y for your child to spend time with their family and had not formed the intention to remain permanently in country Y at this point.
On XXXX you resigned from your employment in Australia and formed the intention to remain permanently in Country Y.
Therefore, from XXXX to XXXX you were a resident of Australia under the resides test.
However, from XXXX you were not a resident of Australia under the resides test.
Domicile test
Under the domicile test, you are a resident of Australia if your domicile is in Australia unless the Commissioner is satisfied that your permanent place of abode is outside Australia.
Domicile
Whether your domicile is Australia is determined by the Domicile Act 1982 and the common law rules on domicile.
Your domicile is your domicile of origin (usually the domicile of your father at the time of your birth) unless you have acquired a domicile of choice elsewhere. To acquire a domicile of choice of a particular country you must be lawfully present there and you must hold the positive intention to make that country your home indefinitely. Your domicile continues until you acquire a different domicile. Whether your domicile has changed depends on an objective consideration of all relevant facts.
You were born in Country Y and you are a citizen of Country Y.
It is not evident that you acquired a domicile of choice in Australia while you lived here.
You are not a resident under this test.
183-day test
Where a person is present in Australia for 183 days during the year of income the person will be a resident, unless the Commissioner is satisfied that the person's usual place of abode is outside Australia and the person does not intend to take up residence in Australia.
You were not in Australia for more than 183 days in the XXXX income year.
You are not a resident under this test.
Superannuation Test
An individual is a resident of Australia if they are either a member of the superannuation scheme established by deed under the Superannuation Act 1990 or an eligible employee for the purposes of the Superannuation Act 1976, or they are the spouse, or the child under 16, of such a person.
You are not a contributing member of the Public Sector Superannuation Scheme (PSS) or the Commonwealth Superannuation Scheme (CSS) or a spouse of such a person, or a child under 16 of such a person.
You are not a resident under this test.
Conclusion
You were a resident of Australia for taxation purposes from XXXX to XXXX.
You are not a resident of Australia for taxation purposes from XXXX.