Disclaimer You cannot rely on this record in your tax affairs. It is not binding and provides you with no protection (including from any underpaid tax, penalty or interest). In addition, this record is not an authority for the purposes of establishing a reasonably arguable position for you to apply to your own circumstances. For more information on the status of edited versions of private advice and reasons we publish them, see PS LA 2008/4. |
Edited version of private advice
Authorisation Number: 1051984354471
Date of advice: 18 May 2022
Ruling
Subject: Residency
Question
Are you a resident of Australia for income tax purposes from XXXX?
Answer
No.
This ruling applies for the following period:
Year ended 30 June 20XX
Year ending 30 June 20XX
The scheme commences on:
1 July 20XX
Relevant facts and circumstances
You are a foreign citizen by birth.
You were offered an employment role at Australian employer in a letter of offer dated XXXX.
You applied for an Employer Nomination Scheme (subclass 186) Permanent Visa in XXXX.
You are currently live in Country A whilst waiting for your visa to be granted.
You began your employment at the Australian employer on the XXXX.
You are working for your employer remotely whilst still living in Country A.
You have been living with family, in Airbnb properties and in temporary rentals in Country A since XXXX.
You intend for your spouse and dependant to come to Australia with you once your vias applications have been approved.
You intend to live in Australia permanently as your visa will permit.
As you do not have an arrival date for arrival in Australia, you have not yet arranged accommodation in Australia.
You have an Australia Superannuation account.
The only assets you hold in Country A are bank accounts:
Your and your family's visas were approved in XXXX.
Due to medical conditions, you have not yet travelled to Australia.
Relevant legislative provisions
Income Tax Assessment Act 1997 Subsection 995-1(1)
Income Tax Assessment Act 1936 Subsection 6(1)
Reasons for decision
Section 995-1 of the Income Tax Assessment Act 1997 (ITAA 1997) defines an Australian resident for tax purposes as a person who is a resident of Australia for the purposes of the ITAA 1936.
The terms resident and resident of Australia, as applied to an individual, are defined in subsection 6(1) of the Income Tax Assessment Act 1936 (ITAA 1936).
The definition offers four tests to ascertain whether each individual taxpayer is a resident of Australia for income tax purposes. These tests are:
• the resides test,
• the domicile test,
• the 183 day test, and
• the superannuation test.
The primary test for deciding the residency status of an individual is whether they reside in Australia according to the ordinary meaning of the word resides.
Where an individual does not reside in Australia according to ordinary concepts, they will still be an Australian resident if they meet the conditions of one of the other tests.
The resides test
The ordinary meaning of the word 'reside', according to the Macquarie Dictionary, 2001, rev. 3rd edition, The Macquarie Library Pty Ltd, NSW, is 'to dwell permanently or for a considerable time; having one's abode for a time', and according to the Compact Edition of the Oxford English Dictionary (1987), is 'to dwell permanently, or for a considerable time, to have one's settled or usual abode, to live in or at a particular place'. These definitions have been highlighted in cases as being definitive observations of the meaning of resides (see Viscount LC in Levene v Commissioners of Inland Revenue [1928] AC 217 and Logan J in Stockton v Federal Commissioner of Taxation [2019] FCA 1679).
The observations contained in the case of Hafza v Director-General of Social Security (1985) 6 FCR 444 are also important:
Physical presence and intention will coincide for most of the time. But few people are always at home. Once a person has established a home in a particular place - even involuntarily: see Commissioners of Inland Revenue v Lysaght [1928] AC 234 at 248; and Keil v Keil [1947] VLR 383 - a person does not necessarily cease to be resident there because he or she is physically absent. The test is whether the person has retained a continuity of association with the place - Levene v Inland Revenue Commissioners [1928] AC 217 at 225 and Judd v Judd (1957) 75 WN (NSW) 147 at 149 - together with an intention to return to that place and an attitude that that place remains " home " : see Norman v Norman (No 3) (1969) 16 FLR 231 at 235 ... [W]here the general concept is applicable, it is obvious that, as residence of a place in which a person is not physically present depends upon an intention to return and to continue to treat that place as " home " , a change of intention may be decisive of the question whether residence in a particular place has been maintained.
Case law decisions have considered the following factors in relation to whether the taxpayer was a resident under the 'resides' test:
• Physical presence
• Intention or purpose of presence
• Family and business/employment ties
• Maintenance and location of assets, and
• Social and living arrangements.
These factors are similar to those which the Commissioner has said are relevant in determining the residency status of individuals in IT 2650 and Taxation Ruling TR 98/17 Income tax: residency status of individuals entering Australia.
It is important to note that not one single factor is decisive, and the weight given to each factor depends on each individual's circumstances.
We consider that your circumstances are not consistent with residing in Australia.
This is because:
• You currently do not physically reside in Australia and are yet to arrive in Australia.
• The only assets you hold within Australia are bank accounts and a superannuation account.
• You currently have no family or social ties to Australia yet as these will be established after you arrive in Australia.
• You only participate in professional activities due to currently still being based overseas.
• You intend to live in Australia permanently with your family after you arrive in Australia.
You are not a resident of Australia under the resides test.
Domicile test
Under the domicile test, you are a resident of Australia if your domicile is in Australia unless the Commissioner is satisfied that your permanent place of abode is outside Australia.
Domicile
Whether your domicile is Australia is determined by the Domicile Act 1982 and the common law rules on domicile.
Your domicile is your domicile of origin (usually the domicile of your father at the time of your birth) unless you have acquired a domicile of choice elsewhere. To acquire a domicile of choice of a particular country you must be lawfully present there and you must hold the positive intention to make that country your home indefinitely. Your domicile continues until you acquire a different domicile. Whether your domicile has changed depends on an objective consideration of all relevant facts.
In your case, you were born in Country A and your domicile of origin is Country A.
You have stated that your intention is to arrive as soon as possible and live in Australia indefinitely only leaving for short holidays.
You are married to a Country A citizen and have been living in Country A whilst working remotely for Australia.
It is considered that you did not abandon your domicile of origin in Country A yet and intend to acquire a domicile of choice in Australia.
You are not a resident of Australia under the domicile test outlined in the definition of 'resident' in subsection 6(1) of the ITAA 1936.
Permanent place of abode
If you have an Australian domicile, you are an Australian resident unless the Commissioner is satisfied that your permanent place of abode is outside Australia. This is a question of fact to be determined in light of all the facts and circumstances of each case.
'Permanent' does not mean everlasting or forever, but it is to be distinguished from temporary or transitory.
The courts have held that the phrase 'permanent place of abode' calls for a consideration of the town or country where a person is located. It does not extend to more than one country, or a region of the world.
The Full Federal Court in Harding v Commissioner of Taxation [2019] FCA 29 held at paragraphs 36 and 40 that key considerations in determining whether a taxpayer has his or her permanent place of abode outside Australia are:
(a) whether the taxpayer has definitely abandoned, in a permanent way, living in Australia; and
(b) whether the taxpayer is living permanently in a specific country.
Paragraph 23 of Taxation Ruling IT 2650 Residency - Permanent place of abode outside Australia sets out the following factors which are used by the Commissioner in reaching a state of satisfaction as to a taxpayer's permanent place of abode:
(a) the intended and actual length of the taxpayer's stay in the overseas country;
(b) whether the taxpayer intended to stay in the overseas country only temporarily and then to move on to another country or to return to Australia at some definite point in time;
(c) whether the taxpayer has established a home (in the sense of dwelling place; a house or other shelter that is the fixed residence of a person, a family, or a household), outside Australia;
(d) whether any residence or place of abode exists in Australia or has been abandoned because of the overseas absence;
(e) the duration and continuity of the taxpayer's presence in the overseas country; and
(f) the durability of association that the person has with a particular place in Australia, i.e. maintaining assets in Australia, informing government departments such as the Department of Social Security that he or she is leaving permanently and that family allowance payments should be stopped, place of education of the taxpayer's children, family ties and so on.
As with the factors under the resides test, no one single factor is decisive, and the weight given to each factor depends on the individual circumstances.
The Commissioner is satisfied that your permanent place of abode is outside Australia. This takes into account that:
• You are yet to arrive and reside in Australia.
• You intend to abandon your domicile in Country A once you arrive in Australia to live permanently.
Therefore, you are not a resident of Australia under this test.
183-day test
Where a person is present in Australia for 183 days during the year of income the person will be a resident, unless the Commissioner is satisfied that the person's usual place of abode is outside Australia and the person does not intend to take up residence in Australia.
You have not been present in Australia for 183 days or more during the income year. You are not a resident under this test.
Superannuation Test
An individual is a resident of Australia if they are either a member of the superannuation scheme established by deed under the Superannuation Act 1990 or an eligible employee for the purposes of the Superannuation Act 1976, or they are the spouse, or the child under 16, of such a person.
You are not a contributing member of the Public Sector Superannuation Scheme (PSS) or the Commonwealth Superannuation Scheme (CSS) or a spouse of such a person, or a child under 16 of such a person. Therefore, you are not a resident under this test.
Conclusion
As you do not satisfy any of the four tests of residency, you are not a resident of Australia for income tax purposes for the years ended 30 June 2021 and 30 June 20XX.