Edited version of private advice

Authorisation Number: 1052257900891

Date of advice: 4 June 2024

Ruling

Subject: Foreign super fund

QuestionIs the Country A pension fund a 'foreign superannuation fund' as defined in section 995-1 of the Income Tax Assessment Act 1997 (ITAA 1997)?

Answer

Yes.

This ruling applies for the following periods:

Year ended 30 June 20xx

Year ending 30 June 20xx

The scheme commenced on:

1 July 20xx

Relevant facts and circumstances

You are an Australian resident for tax purposes.

Your parent (the deceased) was a Country A resident for tax purpose, and passed away on XX XX XXXX.

The Deceased had a Country A based pension fund.

The balance of the Deceased's interest in the Country A fund on XX XX XXXX was XX.

There were no contributions or foreign fund transfers into the Country A fund since the deceased had passed.

You inherited the Deceased's benefits in the Country A fund.

You now wish to receive a lump sum into your Australian bank account.

The rules of the Country A fund provide that superannuation benefits can only be paid for retirement, ill-health and death.

Relevant legislative provisions

Income Tax Assessment Act 1997 section 295-95

Income Tax Assessment Act 1997 subsection 295-95(2)

Income Tax Assessment Act 1997 Subdivision 305-B

Income Tax Assessment Act 1997 section 305-55

Income Tax Assessment Act 1997 section 305-70

Income Tax Assessment Act 1997 section 305-75

Income Tax Assessment Act 1997 section 995-1

Income Tax Assessment Act 1997 subsection 995-1(1)

Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993 section 10

Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993 section 62

Detailed reasoning

Lump sum payments received from certain foreign superannuation funds

Subdivision 305-B of the Income Tax Assessment Act 1997 (ITAA 1997) sets out the tax treatment of superannuation lump sum benefits paid from foreign superannuation funds and other foreign schemes for the payment of similar retirement or death benefits, as defined in section 305-55 of the ITAA 1997.

Before determining whether an amount is assessable income under subdivision 305-B of the ITAA 1997, it is necessary to determine whether the payment is being made from a foreign superannuation fund. If the entity making the payment is not a foreign superannuation fund (or scheme for the payment of superannuation benefits), Subdivision 305-B will not apply to the payment.

Meaning of 'foreign superannuation fund'

A foreign superannuation fund is defined in subsection 995-1(1) of the ITAA 1997 as follows:

A superannuation fund is a foreign superannuation fund at a time or for an income year if the fund is not an Australian superannuation fund at that time or for that income year.

Subsection 295-95(2) of the ITAA 1997 defines Australian superannuation fund as follows:

A superannuation fund is an Australian superannuation fund at a time (and for the income year in which that time occurs) if:

a)            the fund was established in Australia, or any asset of the fund is situated in Australia; and

b)            at that time, the central management and control of the fund is ordinarily in Australia; and

c)            at that time, either the fund had no active members or at least 50% of:

i)             the total market value of the fund's assets attributable to superannuation interests held by active members; or

ii)             the sum of the amounts that would be payable to, or in respect of, active members if they voluntarily ceased to be members;

iii)             is attributable to superannuation interests held by active members who are Australian residents.

The three tests under subsection 295-95(2) must be satisfied at the same time. If a fund fails to satisfy one of the above tests at a particular time, it is not an Australian fund at that time.

A superannuation fund that is established, managed or controlled outside of Australia or has all of its assets outside of Australia would qualify as a foreign superannuation fund. The fact that some of its members may be Australian residents would not necessarily alter this.

Section 305-55 of the ITAA 1997 also provides for a lump sum benefit payment (that is not a pension payment) made from a foreign retirement scheme (that provides retirement benefits 'in the nature of superannuation') to receive the same tax treatment as a superannuation lump sum paid from a foreign superannuation fund. However, the conditions in Subsection 305-55(2) must be met, including:

a)            the scheme was not established in Australia; and

b)            the scheme is not centrally managed or controlled in Australia.

Meaning of 'superannuation fund'

Superannuation fund is defined in subsection 995-1(1) of the ITAA 1997 as having the meaning given by section 10 of the Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993 (SISA).

Subsection 10(1) of the SISA defines a superannuation fund as:

a)            a fund that is:

i)             an indefinitely continuing fund; and

ii)             a provident, benefit, superannuation or retirement fund; or

b)            a public sector superannuation scheme.

Meaning of 'provident, superannuation or retirement fund'

The High Court examined both the terms superannuation fund and fund in Scott v Federal Commissioner of Taxation (No. 2) (1966) 10 AITR 290; (1966) 40 ALJR 265; (1966) 14 ATD 333 (Scott). In that case, Justice Windeyer stated:

... I have come to the conclusion that there is no essential single attribute of a superannuation fund established for the benefit of employees except that it must be a fund bona fide devoted as its sole purpose to providing for employees who are participants money benefits (or benefits having a monetary value) upon their reaching a prescribed age. In this connexion "fund", I take it, ordinarily means money (or investments) set aside and invested, the surplus income therefrom being capitalised. I do not put this forward as a definition, but rather as a general description.

The issue of what constitutes a provident, benefit, superannuation or retirement fund was discussed by the Full Bench of the High Court in Mahony v Federal Commissioner of Taxation (1967) 41 ALJR 232; (1967) 14 ATD 519 (Mahony). In that case, Justice Kitto stated that a fund had to exclusively be a 'provident, benefit or superannuation fund' and that 'connoted a purpose narrower than the purpose of conferring benefits in a completely general sense'. This narrower purpose meant that the benefits had to be 'characterised by some specific future purpose'. Justice Kitto's judgment indicated that a fund is not a 'provident, benefit or superannuation fund' if there are provisions for paying benefits 'for any other reason whatsoever.' Although a fund may contain provisions for retirement purposes, it cannot be accepted as a superannuation fund if it contains provisions for benefits to be paid in circumstances other than the member's retirement.

In the case of Baker v FC of T 2015 ATC 10-399; (2015) AATA 469 (Baker), Senior Member O'Loughlin stated that:

...a trust arrangement that is not a provident fund, benefit fund or retirement fund, that allows for payment of superannuation styled benefits and other benefits not permitted by the Supervision Act will not be a superannuation fund ... Accordingly, for a payment to be a payment from a scheme for the payment of benefits in the nature of superannuation upon retirement the scheme would need to provide for payments that have the essential qualities, character or features of payments of superannuation benefits on retirement. Further, the scheme would need to be such that such payments were more than just possibilities among a range of alternatives such as simple withdrawals available at any time.

In paragraph 62(1)(a) of the SISA, a regulated superannuation fund must be 'maintained solely' for the 'core purposes' of providing benefits to a member only when one of the following events occurs:

a.            on or after retirement from gainful employment

b.            attaining a prescribed retirement age

c.            the member dies (which may require the benefits to be passed on to the member's dependants or legal representative).

The SISA and the Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Regulations 1994 (SISR) provide guidance as to what 'benefit' or 'specific future purpose' a superannuation fund should provide. This guidance is still relevant to understanding the purpose of foreign superannuation funds, even though the SISA applies only to 'regulated superannuation funds' (as defined in section 19 of the SISA) that are established in Australia and operate in Australia.

In view of the legislation and decisions made in the Scott and Baker cases, a fund can only be classified as a superannuation fund if it exclusively provides benefits for the purpose of payment upon the member's retirement, invalidity or death, or as otherwise specified under the SISA and SISR.

A foreign retirement fund is not a superannuation fund for Australian income tax purposes if the fund allows for withdrawals for pre-retirement purposes, such as education, medical expenses or housing costs.

In this case, the rules of the Country A pension Fund states that 'You can withdraw all or any of the assets in your individual retirement account at any time' and provides that the benefits of the fund can only be paid out to fund members or beneficiaries under the following circumstances:

The member retires or dies

The fund's rules also state not to make any assets of the fund available for the member's personal benefit or enjoyment.

As the benefits in the fund are paid only for retirement purposes, the fund meets the 'sole purpose test' and therefore is a 'superannuation fund' for Australian income tax purposes.

Therefore, a lump sum paid from this fund is from a 'foreign superannuation fund' as defined in subsection 995-1(1) of the ITAA 1997.

Consequently, Subdivision 305-B of the ITAA 1997 will apply to any lump sum payments that you will receive from the Country A Fund.