Disclaimer
You cannot rely on this record in your tax affairs. It is not binding and provides you with no protection (including from any underpaid tax, penalty or interest). In addition, this record is not an authority for the purposes of establishing a reasonably arguable position for you to apply to your own circumstances. For more information on the status of edited versions of private advice and reasons we publish them, see PS LA 2008/4.

Edited version of private advice

Authorisation Number: 1052309394934

Date of advice: 30 October 2024

Ruling

Subject: ESS - minimum holding period

Question

Will the Commissioner allow the minimum holding period for ESS intereststo be reducedin accordance with sub-paragraph 83A-45(5)(a)(ii) of the ITAA 1997?

Answer

Yes. For the purposes of section 83A-45(4) of the ITAA 1997, the Commissioner will exercise his discretion under paragraph 83A-45(5)(a) to allow the minimum holding period for all ESS interests, if any, that qualify for concessional treatment under section 83A-33 to be reduced. The Commissioner will allow the minimum holding period to be the period starting when the options were acquired and ending at the date on which the options were sold in connection with a 100% acquisition of the shares in the Company by the Purchaser.

This ruling applies for the following period:

1 July 20XX to 30 June 20XX

The scheme commenced on:

1 July 20XX

Relevant facts and circumstances

Background

1.      The Company is an Australian resident private company.

2.      The Company has a Parent Company.

3.      The Parent Company has made grants of options to Australian employees (Participants) that were intended to qualify for the ESS start-up concessions under Subdivision 83A-B of the ITAA 1997.

4.      The grants were made under the Employee Incentive Plan (the Plan).

5.      The grants of options are governed by the Plan.

6.      For the purpose of satisfying the 3-year minimum holding period requirement for options under the start-up concessions the Plan provides that a Participant must not dispose of his or her legal or beneficial interest in an Option or Option Share (other than a disposal in accordance with section 83A-130 of the ITAA97) until the earlier of:

(a) 3 years after the issue of the Option or such earlier time as the Commissioner of Taxation allows in accordance with section 83A-45(5) of the ITAA 1997; and

(b) where the Participant becomes a Leaver.

7.      The Company has stated that at all times the Company has operated the Plan such that all options and shares would not be permitted to be disposed of during the minimum 3 year holding period in accordance with the requirement in subsections 83A-45(4) and (5) of the ITAA 1997.

8.      The company has confirmed that at the time options were granted there was no indication that a 100% sale of the Company would occur.

The Transaction

9.      The Company started negotiations with the Purchaser in respect of a sale of all the shares in the Company.

10.   The Transaction will be completed on the Completion Date.

11.   At the Completion Date, the options will be sold to the Purchaser.

12.   The disposal of the options in connection with completion will fall within 3 years of the grant of all options issued under the Plan.

Relevant legislative provisions

section 83A-33 of the ITAA 1997

subsection 83A-45(4) of the ITAA 1997

subsection 83A-45(5) of the ITAA 1997

Section 83A-130 of the ITAA 1997

Reasons for decision

In order to qualify for the ESS start-up concessions under section 83A-33, the options must meet all of the conditions set down in subsection 83A-33(1).

One of the conditions is the minimum holding period condition detailed in subsections 83A-45(4) and 83A-45(5).

Subsection 83A-45(4)

The minimum holding period condition is satisfied if the scheme is operated so that every acquirer of an ESS interest (the scheme interest) under the scheme is not permitted to dispose of:

(a)  the scheme interest; or

(b)  a beneficial interest in a share acquired as a result of the scheme interest;

during the scheme interests minimum holding period.

Subsection 83A-45(5)

An ESS interest's minimum holding period is the period starting when the interest is acquired under the employee share scheme and ending at the earlier of:

(a)  3 years later, or such earlier time as the Commissioner allows if the Commissioner is satisfied that:

(i)            the operators of the scheme intended for subsection (4) to apply to the interest during the 3 years after the acquisition of the interest; and

(ii)           at the earlier time that the Commissioner allows all membership interests in the relevant company were disposed of under a particular scheme:

(b)  when the acquirer of the interest ceases being employed by the relevant employer.

Provided that all the membership interests in the Company are acquired under the Transaction pursuant to the ESS start-up concessions under Subdivision 83A-B then the only remaining consideration is whether the Company intended for subsection 83A-45((4) to apply to the interest during the 3 years after the acquisition of the interest by the Participants.

The Commissioner notes that an operator of a scheme implemented pursuant to the ESS start-up concessions under section 83A-33 would fail the test if they had either allowed a participant to dispose of their interest prior to the end of its minimum holding period or there was objective evidence that the scheme was not operated to prevent the participants under the scheme from doing so.

Application to your circumstances

The Company has made grants of options to Participants that were intended to qualify for the ESS start-up concessions under Subdivision 83A-B.

The Company has stated that at all times the Company has operated the Plan such that all options would not be permitted to be disposed of during the 3 year minimum holding period in accordance with the requirement in subsections 83A-45(4) and 83A-45(5).

The Company is disposing 100% of the membership in the Company to a Purchaser.

The disposal of the options in connection with completion fell within 3 years of the grant of all options issued under the Plan.

Objectively the Commissioner would not accept that that the scheme was operated to prevent the Participants from disposing of their interests before the end of the minimum holding period where those interests were allocated after the time that it became clear that a takeover was imminent.

As the evidence indicates that this is not the case the Commissioner will exercise his discretion to allow the reduced minimum holding period to apply.