Disclaimer
You cannot rely on this record in your tax affairs. It is not binding and provides you with no protection (including from any underpaid tax, penalty or interest). In addition, this record is not an authority for the purposes of establishing a reasonably arguable position for you to apply to your own circumstances. For more information on the status of edited versions of private advice and reasons we publish them, see PS LA 2008/4.

Edited version of private advice

Authorisation Number: 1052382017781

Date of advice: 15 April 2025

Ruling

Subject: Capital gains tax

Question 1

Would Company A and Entity B be connected for the purpose of the $6,000,000 maximum net value asset test as outlined in section 152-15 of the Income Tax Assessment Act 1997 (ITAA 1997)?

Answer 1

Yes.

Question 2

If yes, can the Commissioner exercise his discretion to disregard this connection pursuant to subsection 328-125(6) of the ITAA 1997?

Answer 2

Yes.

This ruling applies for the following period:

Income year ended 30 June 20XX

The scheme commenced on:

1 July 20XX

Relevant facts and circumstances

Company A is a trading entity that runs an insurance broking business.

Entity B owns 49% B class shares in Company A.

Company A also has 51% of A class shares on issue to a third party.

The A and B class shares have equal rights in terms of voting at general meetings, receiving dividends and capital distributions upon the company winding up.

When Company A was originally created it was the understanding between all the shareholders that Entity B and Individual B would purely be silent investors and take no part in the actual running of the business.

Individual B has never been a director of Company A and has never taken any part in the running of the business.

The shareholders agreement outlines the responsibilities of all parties involved:

•                The Board is responsible for the direction and control of Company A.

•                The Board consists of one director, Individual A.

•                Individual A holds the power to appoint, remove and replace that director.

•                Individual A is the initial sole director and managing director responsible for the day-today operations of Company A.

Individual B is and has been a silent investor since the inception of the company as outlined by the company constitution and shareholders agreement.

Relevant legislative provisions

Income Tax Assessment Act 1997 subsection 328-125(2)

Income Tax Assessment Act 1997 subsection 328-126(6)