Taxation Ruling
IT 2628
Income tax: trusts - concessional treatment on winding up of non-resident trusts
-
Please note that the PDF version is the authorised consolidated version of this ruling and amending notices.This document is no longer current as has been Archived.View the Archival notice for this document.This document has been Withdrawn.View the Withdrawal notice for this document.
FOI status:
May be releasedFOI number: I 1012551NOTICE OF ARCHIVAL - 9th DECEMBER 1993
NOTE
PREAMBLE
The purpose of this Ruling is to clarify an issue relating to the availability of the concessional tax treatment provided under section 102AAN of the Income Tax Assessment Act 1936 (the Act) for taxable distributions made by certain non-resident trusts that are wound up before 30 June 1991. One interpretation of the provision would unduly restrict the availability of the concession and to that extent would defeat the legislative purpose of encouraging people to wind up non-resident trusts controlled by Australian residents.
2. Section 102AAN provides for the grant of a rebate of tax that will have the effect that the tax applicable to certain distributions made by non-resident discretionary trusts will not exceed 10 per cent of the taxable amount of the distributions. The rebate will apply only where the distribution is made after 7.30pm Eastern Standard Time on 12 April 1989 (the Information Paper or 'IP' time) and before 30 June 1991. The other conditions set out in section 102AAN must also be satisfied.
3. Clarification has been sought on the interpretation to be placed on the condition set out in paragraph 102AAN(1)(e), in particular whether the term 'transferors' that is used in that paragraph is to be taken to refer to -
- .
- any transferor, whether an Australian entity or not, as referred to in paragraph 102AAN(1)(b); or
- .
- an Australian entity as referred to in paragraph 102AAN(1)(c).
RULING
4. Paragraph 102AAN(1)(b) requires that one or more 'entities' should have transferred property or services to the non-resident trust estate before the IP time. As stated above, in this context these entities are referred to as 'transferors', and paragraph 102AAN(1)(b) does not limit this category to Australian entities.
5. Paragraph 102AAN(1)(c) also uses the concept of transferors but also specifies that at least one of the transferors should have been an Australian entity at one of the following times:
- (i)
- when the property or services were transferred;
- (ii)
- in the case of a natural person (not being a trustee), at the end of 30 June 1991; or
- (iii)
- in the case of companies, partnerships and natural persons in the capacity of trustees, the IP time.
6. Paragraph 102AAN(1)(e) provides, in general, that the 'transferors', or associates of the transferors, should not have transferred property or services to the trust estate after the IP time.
7. A construction of paragraph 102AAN(1)(e) that gives the term 'transferor' the same meaning as it has in paragraph 102AAN(1)(b) will have the effect that the coverage of the tax concession provided in section 102AAN will be narrowed down unduly.
This is because a non-resident entity that provided, for example, accounting and management services to the trust, will be treated as a transferor under paragraph 102AAN(1)(b). This in turn would lead to the unacceptable result that if the non-resident entity continues to provide services to the trust after the IP time, paragraph 102AAN(1)(e) would preclude the beneficiaries of that trust from the concession. A construction that limits the availability of the rebate in this way is seen as inconsistent with the purpose of the section, which is to provide an incentive to wind up non-resident discretionary trusts controlled by Australian residents who would be liable to tax under the accruals measures.
10. Given the purpose of the provision and given that people only have until 30 June 1991 to avail themselves of this concession, a purposive approach will be taken to the interpretation of paragraph 102AAN(1)(e). Support for this approach can be found in the Explanatory Memorandum on paragraph 102AAN(1)(b) which in referring to an Australian entity that transfers property or services to the trust shows, that it was intended that only transferors that are Australian entities should be within the scope of that paragraph.
11. In other words, paragraph 102AAN(1)(e) will be applied so as to deny the concessional treatment provided by section 102AAN only where an Australian entity or an associate of the Australian entity transferred property or services to that trust after the IP time.
COMMISSIONER OF TAXATION
14 March 1991
References
ATO references:
NO 91/2134-0
Date of effect:
Immediate
Related Rulings/Determinations:
IT 2628 NOTICE OF ARCHIVAL
IT 2628W
Subject References:
TRUSTS - CONCESSIONAL TREATMENT ON WINDING UP OF NON-RESIDENT TRUSTS
Legislative References:
102AAN