Taxation Determination
TD 92/172
Income tax: capital gains: do the dwellings referred to in subsection 118-170(1) of the Income Tax Assessment Act 1997 have to be post-CGT assets?
-
Please note that the PDF version is the authorised consolidated version of this ruling and amending notices.This document incorporates revisions made since original publication. View its history and amending notices, if applicable.
FOI status:
may be releasedFOI number: I 1213454
This Determination, to the extent that it is capable of being a 'public ruling' in terms of Part IVAAA of the Taxation Administration Act 1953, is a public ruling for the purposes of that Part. Taxation Ruling TR 92/1 explains when a Determination is a public ruling and how it is binding on the Commissioner. Unless otherwise stated, this Determination applies to years commencing both before and after its date of issue. [ Note: This is a consolidated version of this document. Refer to the Tax Office Legal Database (http://law.ato.gov.au) to check its currency and to view the details of all changes.] |
1. No. Subsection 118-170(1) of the Income Tax Assessment Act 1997 (ITAA 1997)[1] does not require that the dwellings be post-CGT assets. The subsection merely requires that each spouse has a separate dwelling which is his or her main residence.
Example
2. A husband and wife jointly own both a pre-CGT house (occupied by the wife) and a post-CGT house (occupied by the husband). The husband and wife can choose the post-CGT house as their main residence under paragraph 118-170(1)(a).
3. Note: in this case, the spouses are not living separately and apart on a permanent basis (subsection 118-170(1)).
Commissioner of Taxation
22/10/92
Previously Draft TD 92/D149
References
ATO references:
NO CGT Cell PRE
Related Rulings/Determinations:
TD92174
Subject References:
CGT main residence exemption
interests in dwelling
Legislative References:
ITAA 1997 118-170(1)
ITAA 1997 118-170(1)(a)
Date: | Version: | Change: | |
22 October 1992 | Original ruling | ||
29 November 2006 | Original ruling + note | Repeal provision note | |
You are here | 17 March 2010 | Consolidated ruling | Addendum |