ATO Interpretative Decision

ATO ID 2003/757 (Withdrawn)

Income Tax

Capital Allowances: balancing adjustment event - early termination of non-novated luxury car lease
FOI status: may be released
  • This ATO ID is withdrawn. Guidance on the issue contained in this ATO ID can be found in ATO ID 2003/756.
    This document has changed over time. View its history.

CAUTION: This is an edited and summarised record of a Tax Office decision. This record is not published as a form of advice. It is being made available for your inspection to meet FOI requirements, because it may be used by an officer in making another decision.

This ATOID provides you with the following level of protection:

If you reasonably apply this decision in good faith to your own circumstances (which are not materially different from those described in the decision), and the decision is later found to be incorrect you will not be liable to pay any penalty or interest. However, you will be required to pay any underpaid tax (or repay any over-claimed credit, grant or benefit), provided the time limits under the law allow it. If you do intend to apply this decision to your own circumstances, you will need to ensure that the relevant provisions referred to in the decision have not been amended or repealed. You may wish to obtain further advice from the Tax Office or from a professional adviser.

Issue

Does a balancing adjustment event occur for a luxury car under paragraph 40-295(1)(a) of the Income Tax Assessment Act 1997 (ITAA 1997) on the early termination of the lease in the circumstances of section 42A-100 of Schedule 2E to the Income Tax Assessment Act 1936 (ITAA 1936)?

Decision

No. Even though the lessee changes from being a holder of the car under item 1 of the table in section 40-40 of the ITAA 1997 to being a holder of the car under item 10 of that table, a balancing adjustment event under paragraph 40-295(1)(a) of the ITAA 1997 does not occur for the car because the lessee does not stop holding it.

Facts

The taxpayer is the lessee of a luxury car with the effect that Division 42A of Schedule 2E to the ITAA 1936 applies to the arrangement. The taxpayer and the lessor are the only parties to the arrangement which does not involve full or partial novation as described in Taxation Ruling TR 1999/15. The taxpayer terminated the lease before the end of the lease term and, on termination, acquired the car from the lessor. As a result, the provisions of section 42A-100 of Schedule 2E to the ITAA 1936 apply.

Reasons for Decision

Under subsection 42A-15(2) of Schedule 2E to the ITAA 1936, the lessee 'is taken to be the owner of the car until the lease term ends or the lease is terminated before that time, as the case may be.' During that period of 'ownership', the lessee is the holder of the car under item 1 of the table in section 40-40 of the ITAA 1997.

The taxpayer terminated the lease before the end of the lease term and, on termination, acquired the car from the lessor. This means that the 'ownership' period under subsection 42A-15(2) of Schedule 2E to the ITAA 1936 ceased and item 1 of the table in section 40-40 of the ITAA 1997 no longer applied from that time.

On the acquisition of the car, the lessee becomes the holder of it under item 10 of the table in section 40-40 of the ITAA 1997. However, section 42A-100 of Schedule 2E to the ITAA 1936 provides that where an early termination of the lease occurs and, on that termination, 'an amount is paid to the lessor by, or on behalf of, the lessee to acquire the car', the lessee 'is taken to continue to be the owner of the car until the lessee disposes of it' (see paragraph 42A-100(c) of Schedule 2E to the ITAA 1936). The effect of this provision is to provide a continuous holding of the car by the lessee.

A balancing adjustment event occurs for a depreciating asset under paragraph 40-295(1)(a) of the ITAA 1997 if a holder of the asset stops holding it. The change from the taxpayer being a holder as lessee under item 1 of the table in section 40-40 of the ITAA 1997 to being a holder as owner under item 10 of the table in section 40-40 of the ITAA 1997 does not, in this case, cause the taxpayer to stop holding the car at any time because the effect of paragraph 42A-100(c) of Schedule 2E to the ITAA 1936 is to provide a continuous holding of the car by the taxpayer.

Consequently, no balancing adjustment event occurred for the car under paragraph 40-295(1)(a) of the ITAA 1997.

Date of decision:  5 August 2003

Year of income:  Year ended 30 June 2003

Legislative References:
Income Tax Assessment Act 1936
   subsection 42A-15(2) of Schedule 2E
   section 42A-100 of Schedule 2E
   paragraph 42A-100(c) of Schedule 2E

Income Tax Assessment Act 1997
   section 40-40
   paragraph 40-295(1)(a)

Related Public Rulings (including Determinations)
Taxation Ruling TR 1999/15

Related ATO Interpretative Decisions
ATO ID 2003/756

Keywords
Balancing adjustment event
Capital Allowances CoE
Luxury cars
Luxury car lease

Business Line:  Private Groups and High Wealth Individuals

Date of publication:  22 August 2003

ISSN: 1445-2782

history
  Date: Version:
  5 August 2003 Original statement
You are here 21 March 2016 Archived