Goods and Services Tax Advice

GSTA TPP 021

Goods and services tax: Is a payment by an entity to reimburse a retail outlet for the face value of a section 100-5 voucher (commonly referred to as a face value voucher (FVV)), which was redeemed by a customer, subject to GST?

This version is no longer current. Please follow this link to view the current version.

  • Please note that the PDF version is the authorised version of this ruling.
    This document has changed over time. View its history.

Preamble

This document is a ruling for the purposes of section 37 of the Taxation Administration Act 1953. It illustrates the principles contained in Goods and Services Tax Ruling GSTR 2003/5 on vouchers . You can rely on the information presented in this document, which provides advice on the operation of the GST system.

Answer

No. If the payment is neither consideration for the supply made on the redemption of the FVV nor consideration for a supply by the retail outlet to the entity, it is not consideration for a supply. The payment is made as part of the entity's performance of its contractual obligations under an agreement.

Background

An entity sells FVVs to various retail outlets that sell them to their customers. Under an agreement, the FVVs can be redeemed in any participating retail outlet and, the entity will reimburse a retail outlet that supplies goods on redemption of a voucher which it did not sell.

A customer purchases an FVV from a retail outlet and redeems it for supplies from a different retail outlet. The entity reimburses that retail outlet for the face value of the FVV presented by the customer.

Explanation

The entity's payment to reimburse the retail outlet that accepted the FVV as consideration for the supplies made on its redemption merely compensates the retail outlet for the value of the FVV as it did not sell the FVV. The payment to that retail outlet is not consideration for the supplies it makes on redemption of the FVV by the customer and is not consideration for a supply by the retail outlet to the entity. However, in other circumstances, the payment may be consideration for a separate supply made by the retail outlet to the entity (for example, promotional services) which will depend on the surrounding facts and circumstances of the case.

The payment itself is not a separate supply as a supply of money is not a supply under subsection 9-10(4) of the GST Act.

The payment is held to be made as part of the entity's performance of the contractual obligations under the agreement between the entity and the retail outlets. No GST is payable and no input tax credit is available in relation to that payment.

Application of this GST Advice

This Advice is based on GSTR2003/5. It explains our view of the law as it applied from 1 July 2000. You can rely on this Advice on and from its date of issue for the purposes of section 37 of the Taxation Administration Act 1953. Goods and Services Tax Ruling GSTR 1999/1 explains the GST rulings system and our view of when you can rely on our interpretation of the law in GST public and private rulings.

If this Advice conflicts with a previous private ruling that you have obtained, this public ruling prevails. However, if you have relied on a private ruling, you are protected in respect of what you have done up to the date of issue of this public ruling. This means that if you have underpaid an amount of GST, you are not liable for the shortfall prior to the date of issue of this later ruling. Similarly, you are not liable to repay an amount overpaid by the Commissioner as a refund.

Commissioner of Taxation
14 June 2005

Not previously issued as a draft

References

ATO references:
NO 05/3095

ISSN: 1833-0053

Related Rulings/Determinations:

GSTA TTP 019
GSTA TTP 020

Subject References:
face value vouchers
taxable supplies

Legislative References:
ANTS(GST)A 1999 9-5
ANTS(GST)A 1999 9-10(4)
ANTS(GST)A 1999 Div 100
ANTS(GST)A 1999 100-5
ANTS(GST)A 1999 100-5(2)
TAA 1953 37

GSTA TPP 021 history
  Date: Version: Change:
You are here 14 June 2005 Original ruling  
  31 October 2012 Consolidated ruling Addendum
  30 April 2014 Withdrawn